SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 111

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
BHANWARLAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 456 / 2025



Advocates:
For Appellant(s) :Mr. O.P. Sangwa, Mr. Bheru Lal Jat; For Respondent(s): Mr. Deepak Choudhary, GA cum AAG with Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat

The court allowed the suspension of sentence under Section 14-A(2) of the SC/ST Act, emphasizing the need for a balance between the rights of the accused and justice.

Headnote:(A) SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act - Section 14-A(2) - Application for suspension of sentence - The court allowed the application for suspension of the sentence awarded to the accused, considering the time likely for the appeal hearing - The accused were ordered to be released on bail upon execution of a personal bond and sureties. (Paras 6, 7)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The accused-applicants must appear before the trial court annually until the appeal is decided, and notify any changes in residence. (Paras 7, 8)

Facts of the case:
The case involves ten accused-applicants convicted under the SC/ST Act, with an application for suspension of their sentence pending appeal.

Findings of Court:
The court deemed it appropriate to suspend the sentence due to the anticipated duration of the appeal process.

Issues: The main issue was whether the sentence should be suspended pending the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need to balance the rights of the accused with the interests of justice, allowing suspension of the sentence as a fit case under the Act.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1.Heard.

2. Admit. Issue Notice.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor accepts notice on behalf of respondent - State.

4. Call for record.

5. Heard on application for suspension of sentence No.443/2025.

6. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced by the appellant(s) and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the fact that hearing of the appeal is likely to take time, therefore, this court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant(s).

7. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act Cases, District Chittorgarh vide judgment dated 18.02.2025 in Sessions Case No.162/2015 (41/2019) against the appellant-applicant(s) – 1. Bhanwarlal S/o Sukhdev, 2. Udailal S/o Khema, 3. Smt. Bali W/o Bhanwarlal, 4. Smt. Ratni W/o Narayan, 5. Smt. Udi W/o Mohan, 6. Laxman S/o Bhanwarlal, 7. Ladu S/o Bhagwan Lal, 8. Ratan Lal S/o Mangilal, 9. Mangi Lal S/o Heeraand 10. Bhagwan Lal S/o Mangu shall remain suspended till final disposal of the appeal and he/she/they shall be released on bail provided he/she/they executes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his/her/their appearance in this court on 09.04.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address, they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

8. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) do not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top