SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 612

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
PRAVEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Umesh Kant Vyas, Mr. Ashok Khilery, Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG, Mr. KS Kumpawat

ORDER :

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.)

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned AAG and perused the material available on record.

2. Counsel for the appellant submits that according to the suicide note, Sonam willfully committed suicide and no allegation has been levelled against the accused-appellant. The appellant was on bail during the trial and there is no chance of hearing of the appeal in near future, therefore, the sentence of the appellant may be suspended and he may be released on bail.

3. Learned AAG has opposed the prayer made by the counsel for the appellant.

4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case including the facts that the appellant was on bail during the trial and there is no chance of hearing of the appeal in near future, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentence awarded to the accused appellant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 430 of BNSS (389 Cr.P.C.) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence passed by the learned Additional Session Judge (Women Atrocity Cases), Bhilwara, vi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top