SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 123

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
ASURAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 1834 / 2025



Advocates:
Mr. Gopal Singh Bhati, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

The court granted bail based on the absence of criminal antecedents, the co-accused's earlier bail, and the lack of pending recovery from the petitioner.

Headnote:(A) Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992 - Sections 3, 4, and 6 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, and 471 - Bail application filed for offences related to unfair means in examination - Co-accused has been granted bail, and no recovery is due from the petitioner - Judicial custody affirmed with no criminal antecedents - Court inclined to grant bail based on the circumstances presented. (Paras 1-7)

(B) Bail - Criteria for grant - The court considers the nature of the accusations, the fact that the co-accused was granted bail, and the absence of criminal history in deciding to allow bail. (Paras 6-7)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner is accused of having a dummy candidate appear for an examination and is currently in judicial custody with no recovery pending from him. The co-accused has been granted bail.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the bail application, emphasizing the conditions for release and the need for the petitioner to appear in court.

Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the circumstances and comparison with the co-accused's bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that the circumstances warranted bail, particularly noting the co-accused's release and the absence of recovery from the petitioner.

Result: Bail application allowed.

ORDER :

KULDEEP MATHUR, J.

1.This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.253/2022 registered at Police Station Surajpol, District Udaipur, for offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of the Rajasthan Public Examination (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1992.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the prosecution, one Naresh Kumar appeared as a dummy candidate in place of the present petitioner for the recruitment to the post of Village Development Officer Competitive Examination conducted by the recruitment agency. Learned counsel submitted that the co- accused Naresh Kumar, who had allegedly appeared as dummy candidate in place of the present petitioner, has already been enlarged on bail by a competent criminal Court vide order dated 19.07.2022.

4. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; no recovery is due to be effected from him; he does not have any criminal antecedents and the trial of the case is likely to consume sufficiently long time. On these grounds, he implored the Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the bail application. However, he was not in position to refute the fact that the co-accused Naresh Kumar, who had allegedly appeared as dummy candidate in place of the present petitioner, has already been enlarged on bail by a competent criminal court.

6. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

7. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner Asuram S/o Virdaram arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.253/2022 registered at Police Station Surajpol, District Udaipur, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial court, for his appearance before that court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

8. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top