SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 279

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Sukhlal @ Hukka – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Devendra Sanwalot, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

Order :

1. The application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS (439 of Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.365/2024 registered at Police Station Sadar Banswara, District Banswara, for offences under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 329(3) and 109(1) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the injury report of the injured persons namely Anil and Vikram, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the alleged incident which occurred on 24.11.2024, a sudden fight had erupted between the petitioner and the complainant. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner had no motive to commit the alleged crime. It was contended that although the impugned order dated 04.02.2025 passed by the competent Criminal Court states that the injury allegedly caused to the injured Anil on his head is grievous in nature and dangerous to life, however, the same is not in conformity with the injury report of the injured persons. The injury report of the injured person Anil clearly indicates that the injury allegedly cau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top