SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 356

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
SALIM @ BICHHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Hitendra Singh, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

Order :

1. The application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioners who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.91/2024 registered at Police Station Ghantaghar, District Udaipur for offences under Sections 126(2), 309(6), 311, 109(1), 118(1), 119(1) & 3(5) of BNS and Section 4/25 of the Arms Act.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the challan papers and injury report of the injured Vishal Meena, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that in the alleged incident which occurred on 19.10.2024, the injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioner upon injured with a sharp weapon is simple in nature. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the investigation in the matter against the present petitioner has already been completed and challan has already been filed before the competent Criminal Court.

4. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time to conclude, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top