SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 221

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Dilip @ Dalip – Appellant
Versus
State of Raajsthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Mr. Usman Ghani, Mr. Sameer Pareek, PP

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.728/2024 registered at Police Station Pratap Nagar (Bhilwara), Dist. Bhilwara, for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5) and 110 of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the present case. Drawing attention of the Court towards the challan papers, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in the alleged incident which occurred on 20.12.2024, the injuries allegedly inflicted by the petitioners upon the injured are though grievous in nature but not dangerous to life.

4. Lastly, learned counsel submitted that the petitioners are in judicial custody; investigation against the petitioners has already been completed and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

5. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. However, he was

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top