SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 290

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
Aijaz – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Firoz Khan, Mr. Urja Ram Kalbi, PP

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.633/2024 registered at Police Station Sukher, District Udaipur for the offences under Sections 3/25 , 3/25(6) & 5/25 of Arms Act and Section 111 of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the co- accused Tosif (S. B . Criminal Miscellaneous B ail Application No.394/2025) has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 07.02.2025. Lastly, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody; the case of the present petitioner is not distinguishable from that of the above named co-accused who has already been enlarged on bail by this Court and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

4. Per Contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. However, he was not in a position to refute the fact that the above name co-accused has already been enlar

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top