SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 344

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
LAXMAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLMB / 15235 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Jubin Mehta, Mr. Shrawan Singh Rathore, PP

The court granted bail despite serious allegations against co-accused, emphasizing the absence of specific charges against petitioners and the lengthy trial process.

Headnote:(A) Bail Application - Section 439 Cr.P.C. - Petitioners arrested in connection with serious offences including inflicting head injury - Specific allegations against co-accused, not against petitioners - Judicial custody and lengthy trial considered - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 1, 3, 8)

(B) Judicial Discretion - Court's role in bail applications is to assess the seriousness of allegations without delving into merits of the case - The trial court must not be influenced by observations made in bail proceedings. (Paras 7, 9)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were arrested for serious offences under various sections of BNS, with specific allegations against a co-accused for inflicting a fatal head injury. The petitioners argued for bail due to the lack of direct allegations against them and the lengthy trial process.

Findings of Court:
The court found sufficient grounds to grant bail, emphasizing the need for personal bonds and sureties for the petitioners' appearance during the trial.

Issues: The main issues were the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioners and the appropriateness of granting bail given the circumstances of the case.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that while the allegations were serious, the absence of specific charges against the petitioners warranted the granting of bail, highlighting the importance of not prejudicing the trial court's future decisions.

Result: Bail application allowed.

Order :

1. This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS (old Section 439 Cr.P.C.) has been filed by the petitioners who have been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.167/2024 registered at Police Station Motagaon District Banswara, for the offences under Sections 103(1), 191(2),(3), 324(4), 115(2) & 333 BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR and the statements of complainant-Goti Davod recorded under Section 180 BNS, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the specific allegation of inflicting head injury upon the deceased with a blunt weapon (lathi) has been levelled against co-accused Tola Ram. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that according to the post-mortem report dated 02.11.2024 of the deceased, the cause of death is head injury caused to him. Learned counsel submitted that in the FIR, no specific allegation has been levelled against the present petitioners. The petitioners are in judicial custody; challan has already been filed; and the trial of the case will take sufficiently long time, therefore, the benefit of bail may be granted to the accused-petitioners.

6. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that looking to the seriousness of the allegation against the present petitioners, they do not deserve to be enlarged on bail. However, learned Public Prosecutor was not in a position to refute the fact that specific allegation of inflicting injury by lathi on head of the deceased has been levelled against co-accused person Tola Ram.

7. Having considered the rival submissions, facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

8. Consequently, the bail application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners (1) Laxman S/o Shri Phooliy, (2) Vinod @ Vilay S/o Shri Laxman, (3) Ashok S/o Shri Nathu, (4) Bapulal @ Galji S/o Shri Nathu, (5) Gatulal S/o Shri Nathu, and (6) Kapil @ Kaluram, arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.167/2024 registered at Police Station Motagaon District Banswara, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each, to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, for their appearance before that Court on each & every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till completion of the trial.

9. It is however, made clear that findings recorded/observations made above are for limited purposes of adjudication of bail application. The trial Court shall not get prejudiced by the same.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top