HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS, J
DAL CHAND AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
ARVIND SINGH AND ORS – Respondent
CMA / 2320 / 2018
Judgment :
1- nkosnkj@vihykFkhZx.k }kjk ;g vihy fo}ku eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok vf/kdj.k] nkSlk ¼ftyk U;k;k/kh'k] nkSlk½ }kjk eksVj nq?kZVuk nkok la[;k&262@17 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; ,oa vokMZ fnukad 29-01-18 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh x;h gSA vk{ksfir vokMZ ds ek/;e ls nkosnkj ds vfookfgr 22 o"khZ; iq= dh okgu nq?kZVuk esa e`R;q gks tkus ls fo}ku v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k }kjk fofHkUu enksa esa dqy 2]17]000@&:i;s dk vokMZ 7-5 izfr'kr okf"kZd C;kt lfgr ikfjr fd;k x;k gS] ftls c<k;s tkus gsrq ;g vihy /kkjk 173 eksVj okgu vf/kfu;e ds rgr izLrqr dh xbZ gSA
2- bl izdj.k esa vkjksfir okgu ds Lokeh@pkyd vFkok chek daiuh }kjk dksbZ vihy izLrqr ugha dh x;h gSA
3- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k }kjk fuosnu fd;k x;k fd e`rd ?kVuk ds le; 22 o"kZ dk vfookfgr ;qod FkkA rRle; vdq'ky Jfed dh U;wure etnwjh nj 207@&:i;s izfrfnu Fkh] rnuqlkj izfrdj jkf'k dh x.kuk dh tkos rks fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk fnykbZ xbZ izfrdj jkf'k vi;kZIr gS] dalksfVZ;e ds en esa fnykbZ xbZ jkf'k Hkh ;qfDr;qDr ugha gS rFkk vk; gkfu ds en esa ekrk firk dh vk;q ds vuqlkj xq.kd yxk;k x;k gS tcfd e`rd dh vk;q oxZ ds vuqlkj xq.kd yxk;k tkuk visf{kr Fkk] vr% ;Fkksfpr :i ls izfrdj jkf'k c<k;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
4- fo}ku vf/koDrk izR;FkhZ@chek dEiuh dh vksj ls v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k ds vkns'k dks fof/klEer gksuk crkrs gq, vihy dks [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA
5- nksuksa i{kksa ds rdksZa ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;kA
6. vkjksfir okgu izR;FkhZ chek daiuh ds ;gka ?kVuk ds le; chfer Fkk] nq?kZVuk ds le; e`rd dh vk;q 22 o"kZ Fkh rFkk ?kVuk ds le; vkjksfir okgu ds pkyd dh ykijokgh jgh gS] bu rF;ksa ds laca/k esa dksbZ fookn ugha gSA vfirq ek= izfrdj jkf'k ds laca/k esa gh fookn lhfer jgk gSA
7- nq?kZVuk ds le; e`rd 22 o"kZ dk vfookfgr ;qod FkkA izdj.k esa nq?kZVuk fnukad 28-03-17 dh gS rRle; vdq'ky Jfed dh U;wure etnwjh 207@&:i;s izfrfnu FkhA rn~uqlkj x.kuk fd;k tkuk mfpr gSA fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk e`rd ds vfookfgr gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, mlds ekrk&firk dh vk;q ds vk/kkj ij xq.kd yxkrs gq, vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh gS] tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors. (2017) 16 SCC 680 esa ikfjr fl)kar ds vuqlkj ,sls ekeyksa esa e`rd dh vk;q ds vuqlkj gh xq.kd yxk;k tkuk visf{kr gS] vr% e`rd dh vk;q 22 o"kZ dks ns[krs gq, izdj.k esa 18 dk xq.kd yxsxk] rn~uqlkj vk; gkfu dh x.kuk dh tkos rks ;g jkf'k 207X30X12X18X1/2=6,70,680/-:i;s gksrh gSA e`rd ds Lofu;ksftr gksus dh fLFkfr dks ns[krs gq, 22 o"kZ ds vk;q oxZ ds gksus ls 40 izfr'kr Hkfo"; esa vk; o`f) dk ykHk 2]68]272@&:i;s izkIr djus dk vf/kdkjh gS] ftlds vuqlkj ;g jkf'k 9]38]952@&:i;s laxf.kr gksrh gS tcfd fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk bl en esa 1]47]000@&:i;s gh fnyk; x;s gS] vr% bl en es a 7]91]952@&:i;s izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA
8- fo}ku vf/kdj.k }kjk dalksfV;e ds en esa dqy 40]000@&:i;s dh izfrdj jkf'k fnykbZ xbZ gS tcfd ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds U;kf;d n`"Vkar Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanuram & Ors. (2018) 18 SCC 130 esa ikfjr fl)kar ds vuqlkj izR;sd nkosnkj 40]000@&:i;s vFkkZr dqy 80]000@&:i;s dalksVhZ;e ds uqdlkuh ds :i esa izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA 'ks"k enksa esa fnykbZ xbZ jkf'k ;Fkksfpr gSA
9- mijksDr foospukuqlkj vihykFkhZx.k mijksDr lHkh enksa esa 8]31]952@&:i;s vfrfjDr izfrdj jkf'k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA
10- rn~uqlkj ;g vihy vkaf'kd :i ls Lohdkj dh tkdj vk{ksfir vokMZ dks mikUrfjr djrs gq, nkosnkj@vihykFkhZx.k ds i{k esa dqy 10]48]952@&:i;s dk vokMZ ikfjr fd;k tkrk gSA vihykFkhZXk.k }kjk iwoZ esa izkIr dh x;h jkf'k dks vokMZ jkf'k esa ls lek;ksftr fd;k tkdj 'ks"k jkf'k vihykFkhZx.k izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh ik;s tkrs gSaA
11- bl vkns'k }kjk c<kbZ xbZ {kfriwfrZ jkf'k ij ewy ;kfpdk nk;j djus dh frfFk ls olwyh rd vihykFkhZx.k 07 izfr'kr okf"kZd lk/kkj.k dh nj ls C;kt izkIr djus ds vf/kdkjh gSA
12- v/khuLFk vf/kdj.k dk vfHkys[k ;fn bl U;k;ky; dks izkIr gks j[kk gS rks vkns'k dh izfr ds lkFk ykSVk;k tkosA
The court established that the School Leaving Certificate is the authoritative document for age determination in compensation claims, emphasizing the need for just compensation based on the loss suff....
The court affirmed that statutory documents for age determination must be prioritized in compensation claims, ensuring just compensation standards are met.
The court established that statutory documents must be prioritized in compensation claims, ensuring just compensation is awarded based on valid evidence.
The principles of just compensation and the need to fully restore the aggrieved to their pre-accident position under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
The court established that statutory documents must be prioritized for age determination in compensation claims, ensuring just compensation for claimants.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.