HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH, MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR, JJ
Gopal Lal S/O Sanwataram - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
CRLAD / 492 / 2024
Decided On : 10-03-2025
(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - Application for suspension of sentence filed by accused-applicants - Allegations against co-accused involve serious injuries to deceased - Accused-applicants claim general allegations and assert a case of free fight - Court considers the circumstances and allows suspension of sentence. (Paras 2, 5, 6)
(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - Accused-applicants to be admitted to bail subject to trial Court's satisfaction and must appear before the Court on specified dates. (Paras 6, 7)
Facts of the case:
The accused-applicants were involved in a case where co-accused allegedly caused head injuries to two deceased individuals during a free fight, with the applicants claiming general allegations against them.
Findings of Court:
The court found it just to allow the suspension of sentence application based on the circumstances and injuries sustained by the accused.
Issues: The main issues addressed were the nature of allegations against the accused-applicants and the justification for allowing the suspension of their sentence.
Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that given the circumstances of a free fight and the injuries sustained by the accused, it was appropriate to suspend the sentence during the appeal process.
Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.
Order :
D.B. Criminal Misc Suspension Of Sentence Application (Appeal) No. 289/2025
1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the accused-applicants along with the appeal.
2. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the accused- applicants have been falsely involved in this matter. Counsel further submits that co-accused-Kamal has caused head injury on the person of deceased-Ramjilal and co-accused-Man Singh has caused head injury on the person of deceased-Gokul. Counsel further submits that the allegation against co-accused-Dharm Singh is that he ran the Jeep over deceased-Ramjilal and Gokul. Counsel further submits that so far present applicants are concerned, allegations against them are general in nature and it is a case of free fight and from the side of the accused, five persons sustained various injuries including fracture. Counsel further submits that the accused-applicants were on bail during trial and hearing of appeal will take long time.
3. Learned Additional Government Advocate and counsel for the complainant have opposed the present application for suspension of sentence.
4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the record.
5. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances and also considering the statement of eye witnesses and also considering the fact that it is a case of free fight and from the side of the accused, five persons sustained various injuries including fracture, we deem it just and proper to allow the suspension of sentence application.
6. In that view of the matter, this criminal misc. suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the accused-applicants shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the accused-applicants be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that the accused-applicants shall appear before this Court on 16.04.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so.
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance.
D.B. Criminal Appeal (Db) No. 492/2024
List along with D.B. Criminal Appeal No.447/2024.
Suspension of sentence granted based on the nature of allegations and circumstances of a free fight, allowing accused-applicants to appeal while on bail.
Suspension of sentence is justified when accused are on bail during trial, and cases involve complexities requiring prolonged appeal processes.
The court allowed the suspension of sentence for accused-applicants pending appeal, emphasizing their prior bail status and involvement of a co-accused.
The court established that non-vital injuries and prior bail status can justify the suspension of a sentence during an appeal.
The court can suspend a sentence during the appeal process if justified by circumstances such as the duration of custody and similar cases.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.