Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS, J
Sahil S/O Mahboob – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Judgment :
vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&, vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k] ckjka }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk dksrokyh ckjka esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&453@24 vijk/k vraxZr /kkjk 143] 384] 307] 506 Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk o /kkjk 3(1)(r)3(2)(v)(va) ,l lh@,l Vh ,DV esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 01-07-24] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k dk tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk [kkfjt fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ;g vihy is'k dh xbZ gSA
2- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k dk dFku gS fd vihykFkhZx.k funksZ"k gS] mUgsa feF;k :i ls bl izdj.k esa vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSaA vihykFkhZx.k fnukad 16-06-24 vFkkZr djhc ukS ekg ls vfHkj{kk esa gS] vfHk;qDrx.k dk dksbZ iwoZorhZ vkijkf/kd fjdksMZ ugha gS] izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxsxk] vr% vihykFkhZx.k dh tekur vihy Lohdkj fd, tkus ,oa mUgsa tekur ij fjgk fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
3- izR;FkhZ@ifjoknh dh vksj ls ckotwn rkehy uksfVl dksbZ mifLFkr ugha gSA
4- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd us tekur vihy dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk
The court ruled that actions taken under the law must comply with statutory requirements to be valid.
Administrative actions must comply with statutory provisions to be valid.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and influence of the legal provisions on the court's decision.
Administrative actions must strictly adhere to statutory provisions and fall within the lawful authority granted to the administrative body.
The court established that statutory documents must be prioritized in compensation claims, ensuring just compensation is awarded based on valid evidence.
The court affirmed the legality of administrative actions taken under statutory provisions, emphasizing adherence to established laws.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and application of the provisions of the 160@1998, 302, 304ch, and 498 sections.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
