HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS, J
DESHRAJ @ JEETU S/O DULICHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
CRLAS / 639 / 2025
Judgment :
1- vihykFkhZx.k&vfHk;qDrx.k dh vksj ls /kkjk 14&, vuqlwfpr tkfr o vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ vf/kfu;e ds vUrxZr ;g tekur vihy v/khuLFk U;k;ky;] fof'k"B U;k;k/kh'k] vuqlwfpr tkfr@vuqlwfpr tutkfr ¼vR;kpkj fuokj.k½ izdj.k] Hkjriqj }kjk iqfyl Fkkuk dkekas esa ntZ izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k&05@25 vijk/k vraxZr /kkjk 189¼2½]115¼2½] 117¼2½] 126¼2½] 333] 324¼4½ ch ,u ,l o /kkjk 3(1)(r)(s), 3(2)(va) ,l lh@,l Vh ,DV esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 27-02-25] ftlds rgr v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk vihykFkhZx.k dk tekur vkosnu varxZr /kkjk 483 ch ,u ,l ,l ¼439 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk½ [kkfjt fd;k x;k gS] ls O;fFkr gksdj tekur dk ykHk nsus ds fy;s vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls ;g vihy is'k dh xbZ gSA
2- fo}ku vf/koDrk vihykFkhZx.k dk dFku gS fd vihykFkhZx.k funksZ"k gS] mUgsa feF;k :i ls bl izdj.k esa vkfyIr fd;k x;k gSaA okLro esa ifjoknh i{k] vfHk;qDr ns'kjkt mQZ thrw dh iq=h dks tcju ys x;s FksA ckn esa vfHk;qDr i{k }kjk viuh cPph dk fookg dj fn;k x;k] mlds ckotwn Hkh ifjoknh i{k }kjk mldh cPph ds lkFk vHknz o v'kksHkuh; O;ogkj fd;k x;k] ftUgsa Vksdus ij ;g feF;k vkjksi.k fd;k x;k gSA okLro esa ?kVuk ifjoknh i{k }kjk dh x;h Fkh ftldh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ la[;k 6@25 ntZ djok j[kh gSA izdj.k esa dqy 40 vfHk;qDrx.k ds fo:) feF;k vkjksi.k fd;k x;k gS ftuesa ls 11 vfHk;qDRkx.k orZeku izdj.k esa izkFkhZx.k gS rFkk os ,d&Ms< ekg ls vfHkj{kk esa gSA
3- fo}ku yksd vfHk;kstd o fo}ku vf/koDrk ifjoknh us tekur vihy dk fojks/k fd;k rFkk vijk/k dh xaHkhjrk dks ns[krs gq, tekur vihy [kkfjt fd, tkus dk fuosnu fd;k x;kA
4- lHkh i{kksa ds rdksZ ds lanHkZ esa vfHkys[k ij miyC/k lkexzh dk voyksdu fd;k ,oa ekeys ds rF;ksa ij fopkj fd;kA
5- izdj.k esa miyC/k leLr rF;kRed fLFkfr rFkk izLrqr fd;s x;s rdksZa] vfHkj{kk dh vof/k ,oa izdj.k ds fuLrkj.k esa le; yxus dh laHkkouk dks /;ku esa j[krs gq, izdj.k ds bl izdze ij xq.kkoxq.k ij dksbZ jk; O;Dr fd, fcuk vihykFkhZx.k dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj fd;k tkuk mfpr izrhr gksrk gSA
6- ifj.kker% vihykFkhZx.k 1- ns'kjkt mQZ thrw iq= nqyhpna 2- ';keorh iRuh ns'kjkt 3- t;izdk'k iq= ns'kjkt 4- fo'kky iq= ns'kjkt 5- rstiky iq= nqyhpna 6- Mksjhyky iq= fd'kksjh 7- xksfona flga iq= eksgu flag 8- Hkxoku flag iq= txnh'k 9- dUgS;k iq= fHkDdu 10- 'kdaj iq= fHkDdu o 11- dUgS;k iq= vkseh dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g tekur vihy Lohdkj dh tkrh gS vkSj v/khuLFk U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 27-02-25 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izR;sd vihykFkhZx.k bl ekeys esa fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; ds larks"kizn] muds U;k;ky; esa fu;r frfFk;ksa ij ,oa tc Hkh mUgsa cqyk;k tk,] mifLFkfr gsrq ,d yk[k :i;s dk cU/k&i= ,oa ipkl&ipkl gtkj :i;s dh nks izfrHkwfr;kWa izLrqr djs rFkk mldh fdlh vU; izdj.k esa vko';drk u gks rks mUgsa tekur ij fjgk dj fn;k tk,
Administrative actions must comply with statutory provisions to be valid.
The court ruled that actions taken under the law must comply with statutory requirements to be valid.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation and influence of the legal provisions on the court's decision.
The court established that statutory documents must be prioritized in compensation claims, ensuring just compensation is awarded based on valid evidence.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.