SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Raj) 1377

UMA SHANKER VYAS
Dharmveer@sammi – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Rajneesh Gupta & Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, for the Appellant
Mr. Ganesh Saini, PP Mr. Ashvin Garg, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

1- ;kph@vfHk;qDr vkxs **vfHk;qDr** dgk tk,xk ds }kjk ;g iqujh{k.k ;kfpdk fo}ku v/khuLFk U;k;ky; vij ls'ku U;k;k/kh'k] eq.Mkoj }kjk ls'ku izdj.k la[;k 44@18 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 10-10-19 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh x;h gS] ftlds ek/;e ls yafcr fopkj.k esa vUoh{kk/khu vfHk;qDrx.k ds lkFk] vfHk;qDr dk fopkj.k djus gsrq v;kph la[;k&2@ifjoknh vkxs **ifjoknh** dgk tk,xk dh vksj ls izLrqr /kkjk 319 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dk izkFkZuk i= Lohdkj djrs gq, /kkjk 302] 120&ch Hkkjrh; naM lafgrk ds vkjksi esa fopkj.k gsrq gLrxr vfHk;qDr dks vkgwr djus dk vkns'k fn;k x;kA

2- fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk;qDr dk rdZ gS fd /kkjk 319 n.M izfdz;k lafgrk dh 'kfDr;ksa dk iz;ksx iw.kZ lrdZrk ds lkFk o vioknLo:i lqn`< lk{; gksus ij gh fd;k tk ldrk gS] gLrxr ekeys esa vkilh jaft'k ds rgr iw.kZr% feF;k vkjksi yxk;k x;k gSA vuqla/kku esa vfHk;qDr /keZohj mQZ lEeh dh dksbZ Hkwfedk ugha ik;h x;h gS] Lora= xokgku us Hkh mijksDr vkjksiksa dh iqf"V fopkj.k ds nkSjku vius l'kiFk dFkuksa esa ugha dh gSA var esa U;kf;d n`"Vkar 2014 3 ,l lh lh 92 gjnhi flag cuke iatkc jkT; rFkk 2014 3 ,l lh lh 321 fodkl cuke jktLFkku jkT; izLrqr djrs gq, fuosnu fd;k fd mijksDr vk{ksfir vkns'k vikLr fd;k tkosA

3- fo}ku vf/koDrk vfHk

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top