SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 804

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
IRSAD S/O AASMOHAMMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Ankit Khandelwal, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP

Order :

1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.393/2024 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 121(1), 132 and 61(2)(b) of BNS and Sections 66D & 67a of IT Act and Section 3 of PDPP Act , the petitioners have preferred these anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 B.N.S.S.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. It is also contended that custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required and they are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, therefore, these anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail applications.

4. Heard and perused the material available on record.

5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required and they are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, without commenting anything on th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top