Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR, J
SARIF S/O SHERMOHAMMAD @ SHERU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
Order :
1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No. 164/2024 registered at Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 111(2)(a), 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS and Sections 66D and 66E of IT Act, the accused-petitioners have BNSS.
2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submit that accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the accused-petitioners were involved solely on the disclosure statement of the other co-accused. The mobile phones, sim cards, cheques etc. were recovered from the other co-accused Jalish and Saddam. The accused-petitioners have not used the mobiles recovered from the other co-accused. It is further contended that the accused-petitioners are ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and custodial interrogation of the accused-petitioners are not required, therefore, the, anticipatory bail applications of the accused-petitioners may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail applications.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the fact that the rec
Anticipatory bail granted when accused demonstrate willingness to cooperate with investigation and no necessity for custodial interrogation is established.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when custodial investigation is not necessary and the accused are willing to cooperate with the investigation.
The court granted anticipatory bail on the grounds of false implication and lack of necessity for custodial investigation, emphasizing personal liberty.
The court grants anticipatory bail based on the nature of allegations and the accused's willingness to cooperate, emphasizing that custodial investigation is unnecessary when offences are triable by ....
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the petitioner demonstrates willingness to cooperate with the investigation and the nature of evidence does not necessitate custodial interrogation.
Anticipatory bail granted when custodial investigation is not necessary and petitioners are willing to cooperate.
Anticipatory bail granted as custodial investigation not required; petitioners implicated as witnesses in alleged forgery, not beneficiaries.
Anticipatory bail may be granted when the applicant is not named in the FIR, has no criminal antecedents, and is willing to cooperate with the investigation.
Anticipatory bail granted when no substantive evidence exists against petitioners and they cooperated with the investigation.
The court granted anticipatory bail due to lack of substantive evidence against the accused-petitioner and his willingness to cooperate with the investigation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
