HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
RUDRAKSH ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN BANK – Respondent
CW / 404 / 2025
Order :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:
“A. It is, therefore, most respectfully and humbly prayed that your lordship may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and:
B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may be directed to remove the freeze on the bank account and money of the petitioner.
C. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the complaint dated 22.02.2024 (Annexure-3) by which the bank account of the petitioner was put on freeze may kindly be quashed and set-aside to the extent of petitioner.
D. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to pay the 10% interest per annum on the amount in petitioner’s account which has been put on freeze from the date of the freeze till the date of release.
E. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondents may kindly be restricted from putting the bank account of the petitioner under freeze in future without any just reason and reasonable evidence against the petitioner of being involved in any cyber fraudulent activity.
F. Any other order which this Hon’ble court deems just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.
G. In alternate, the petitioner prays that the petitioner is ready to submit/ give a bank guarantee of the disputed/fraudulent amount (as claimed by the respondent No.2 & 3) in the bank. Hence, the respondents may kindly be directed to remove the freeze on the remaining amount of money in the bank account of the humble petitioner.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never misused his bank account for the purpose of illegal transactions and has not committed any cyber crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Agencies and will appear before the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies as and when called upon. He, therefore, prays that the disputed amount which has been received in petitioner’s account may be freezed but, the amount other than the disputed amount may be allowed to be withdrawn. He further prays that the petitioner may be allowed to operate his bank account for the transaction of money.
4. Per contra learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the bank account of the petitioner has been freezed in pursuance of the Notice received from respondent No.2-Cyber Police, Banas Kada, Gujarat and respondent No.3-Cyber Police, Gurugram, Haryana. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank also submits that till the matter is pending investigation, the bank account of the petitioner may not be closed and he my be directed not to discontinue the bank account until the investigation is completed.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable with the submissions made by counsel for the respondent-Bank.
6. In view of the submission made before this Court, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Bank to de-freeze the bank account No.6417433133 of Indian Bank Ltd. of the petitioner and he may be allowed to operate the transaction in his bank account, freezing only the amount of Rs.66,000/- which is allegedly involved in a fraudulent transaction.
7. It is made clear that the petitioner will co-operate with the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies and will appear before them as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue his bank account till the Investigating Agencies and Bank Authorities permit the petitioner to do so. It is further ordered that after the investigation if the petitioner is found involved in any illegal transaction, he shall be liable to pay the amount involved in the illegal transaction and will face the enquiry/investigation as per the law.
8. Stay petition and other pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed
The court affirmed that a bank account should not be unjustly frozen without evidence of wrongdoing, allowing the petitioner to operate his account while restricting only the disputed amount.
A bank account may be de-frozen and operated by the account holder during an investigation, provided they cooperate with authorities and only disputed amounts are frozen.
Freezing a bank account requires just cause and evidence; the petitioner must be allowed to operate their account barring disputed funds.
The court ruled that a bank account can be de-frozen while allowing transactions, provided the account holder cooperates with ongoing investigations.
The court affirmed the right to operate a bank account while addressing concerns related to ongoing investigations into alleged cyber crime, emphasizing cooperation with authorities.
The court affirmed the right to operate non-disputed funds in a bank account while cooperating with ongoing investigations into alleged fraudulent transactions.
The court emphasized the balance between a bank's compliance with law enforcement and the rights of account holders during investigations.
The court ruled that a bank account can be de-frozen for legitimate transactions while freezing disputed amounts involved in alleged fraud, provided the account holder cooperates with investigations.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.