SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 610

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J
Soyal - Appellant
Versus
Bandhan Bank - Respondent
CW / 4314 / 2025
Decided On : 17-02-2025

Advocates:
Mr. Chirag Khatri, Mr. Aditya Singhi

The court ruled that a bank account can be de-frozen while allowing transactions, provided the account holder cooperates with ongoing investigations.

Headnote:

(A) Banking Regulation Act, 1949 - Cyber Crime Regulations - The petitioner sought to quash the freezing of his bank account by the respondent-Bank, asserting no misuse for illegal transactions. The court directed the Bank to de-freeze the account, allowing transactions except for the disputed amount. (Paras 2-6)

(B) Cooperation with Investigating Agencies - The petitioner agreed to cooperate with the investigation and not to close the account until permitted. (Paras 7-8)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner filed a writ petition against the freezing of his bank account, claiming no involvement in illegal activities and readiness to cooperate with authorities.

Findings of Court:
The court ordered the Bank to de-freeze the account, allowing transactions except for the disputed amount related to cyber crime.

Issues: The main issues were the legality of freezing the account and the petitioner’s cooperation with the investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the need for cooperation with the investigation while balancing the petitioner’s rights to operate his account.

Result: Writ petition disposed of.

ORDER :

(VINIT KUMAR MATHUR, J.)

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:

“i). The impugned action of the respondent No.1-Bandhan Bank whereby the account of the petitioner has been frozen may kindly be quashed and set aside.”

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has never misused his bank account for the purpose of illegal transactions and has not committed any cyber crime. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the Investigating Agencies and will appear before the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies as and when called upon. He, therefore, prays that the disputed amount which has been received in petitioner’s account may be freezed but, the amount other than the disputed amount may be allowed to be withdrawn. He further prays that the petitioner may be allowed to operate his bank account for the transaction of money.

4. Per contra learned counsel for the respondent-Bank submits that the bank account of the petitioner has been freezed in pursuance of the instructions received from National Cyber Cell. Learned counsel for the respondent-Bank also submits that till the matter is pending investigation, the bank account of the petitioner may not be closed and he may be directed not to discontinue the bank account until the investigation is completed.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner is agreeable with the submissions made by counsel for the respondent-Bank.

6. In view of the submission made before this Court, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent-Bank to de-freeze the bank account of the petitioner and he may be allowed to operate the transaction in his bank account, freezing only the amount of Rs.3,000/- or any other amount involved in the Cyber crime which is allegedly involved in a fraudulent transaction.

7. It is made clear that the petitioner will co-operate with the Bank Authorities and the Investigating Agencies and will appear before them as and when required. It is also ordered that the petitioner shall not close or discontinue his bank account till the Investigating Agencies and Bank Authorities permit the petitioner to do so. It is further ordered that after the investigation if the petitioner is found involved in any illegal transaction, he shall be liable to pay the amount involved in the illegal transaction and will face the enquiry/investigation as per the law.

8. Stay petition and other pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top