SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 888

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Farjand Ali, J
NITIN DOSI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Puri, Mr. N.S. Chandawat, Dy.G.A.

Order :

1. The instant criminal misc. petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./ 528 BNSS has been preferred by the petitioner for quashing of FIR No.7/2023 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station, Deputy Commissionarate (Crime) Commissionerate Jodhpur for the offence under Sections 420, 406, 120-B of the IPC and Section 66-C and 66-D of the IT Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for quashing the aforementioned FIR and all further proceedings in pursuant thereof.

3. Per contra, learned Deputy Government Advocate opposes the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner for quashing of the FIR and all further proceedings in pursuant thereof.

4. The petitioner is not named in the FIR so also while keeping the investigation pending under sub clause 8 Section 173 of the Cr.P.C., his name was not mentioned there. Now, in relation to an offence under Information Technology, the Agency is trying to book him although he has not committed any offence.

5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the niceties of the matter, this Court feels that though no case for quashing of the FIR is made out but there are certain circumstances persuading to this Court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top