SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 704

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP MATHUR, J
SUMITRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Ashok Nagora, Mr. Prem Singh Panwar, PP

ORDER :

(KULDEEP MATHUR, J.)

This application for bail under Section 483 BNSS has been filed by the petitioner who has been arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.180/2024 registered at Police Station Bhopalgarh, Jodhpur Rural, for the offences under Sections 103(1) and 3(5) of BNS.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material available on record.

3. As per the prosecution, the petitioner and the co-accused Baby, on the date of the alleged incident, strangulated the deceased- Ramli by tying her neck with an odna.

4. Drawing attention of the Court towards the FIR and the challan papers so also the statements of Shrawan Ram, Shanti, Ram Niwas, etc. recorded under Section 180 BNSS, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was not having any motive to commit the alleged crime.

5. Learned counsel submitted that a perusal of the challan papers and the statements of the aforementioned witnesses would further indicate that the husband of the co-accused Baby- Ramvilas was having an extramarital affair with the deceased- Ramli. The co-accused Baby was used to feel harassed and humiliated by the behaviour of the deceased- Ram

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top