SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 721

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MUNNURI LAXMAN, J
SUNIL GODARA – Appellant
Versus
KAMLA – Respondent
CW / 3343 / 2023



Advocates:
Mr. Hemant Shrimali, Mr. P.S. Puniya, Ms. Aasu Devi, Mr. Dhirendra Sou

The court emphasized that a gift deed should not be set aside if the obligated party agrees to provide maintenance under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

Headnote:(A) Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 - The challenge is against the order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer under the Act - The respondent sought maintenance and to set aside a gift deed executed in favor of the petitioner - The petitioner, residing in Canada, undertook to maintain the respondent but opposed the setting aside of the gift deed. (Paras 1-3)

(B) Objective of the Act - The Act aims to provide maintenance to senior citizens who become destitute or dependent on those obligated to maintain them - The court found it inappropriate to set aside the gift deed when the petitioner undertook to pay maintenance. (Paras 3-4)

Facts of the case:
The respondent, a senior citizen, filed for maintenance and to set aside a gift deed executed to her son, alleging he was not taking care of her. The authority ordered to set aside the gift deed instead of granting maintenance.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the impugned order, and directed the petitioner to pay Rs. 10 Lakhs as permanent maintenance to the respondent, to be deposited within 15 days.

Issues: The main issues were whether the gift deed should be set aside when maintenance is undertaken, and the appropriateness of the authority's decision.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the object of the Act is to ensure maintenance for destitute senior citizens, and it was inappropriate to set aside the gift deed when the petitioner agreed to provide maintenance.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Order :

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is against the order dated 23.01.2023 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Jodhpur who is the competent authority under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act of 2007’). The said order was passed on the application of the respondent - senior citizen who is the mother of the petitioner. In the said application filed by the respondent – senior citizen before the special authority, two prayers were sought. One prayer was for seeking fixation of a monthly maintenance and the second prayer sought was to set aside the gift deed dated 10.10.2014 executed by the respondent – senior citizen in favour of the petitioner – son. The petition was filed on the ground that the application for maintenance and setting aside of the gift deed was filed on the premise that the petitioner who is living in Canada is not taking care of the respondent – senior citizen. In the said circumstance, he became destitute and as such filed the application for maintenance. In response to such application, the petitioner herein filed a reply undertaking to maintain the respondent – senior citizen herein and alternatively, requested not to set aside the gift deed. The authority below instead of ordering maintenance, has ordered setting aside of the gift deed.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent - senior citizen submitted that if the petitioner is undertaking to pay monthly maintenance or lump-sum amount, he has no objection to setting aside of the impugned order and his intention is only to get the monthly maintenance from the petitioner.

3. The very object of the Act of 2007 is to provide maintenance to the senior citizens who become destitute/dependent on the person obligated to maintain them. When the person obligated to maintain a senior citizen has come forward to undertake to maintain the senior citizen, it is inappropriate to set aside the gift deed.

4. In the said circumstances, the writ petition is allowed with the following conditions:

i. In the result, the impugned order dated 23.01.2023 is set aside on the ground that the petitioner undertakes to pay Rs. 10 Lakhs as permanent maintenance to the respondent – senior citizen / mother. The said amount shall be deposited in the bank account of the respondent – citizen within a period of 15 days from today. The respondent – senior citizen is directed to furnish the bank account details to the petitioner. On furnishing such bank account details, the amount shall be deposited within the stipulated time undertook by the petitioner, failing which the order of the Sub-Divisional Officer, Jodhpur would be revived.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top