SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 738

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
Mr. Justice Praveer Bhatnagar, J
MAHENDRA SINGH S/O SHIR RAGHUNATH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Govind Upadhyay, Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP

Order :

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of the accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.400/2024 registered at Police Station Gandhi Nagar (Ajmer), District Ajmer, for the offence(s) under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC.

2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the accused-petitioner borrowed Rs.10 lakhs from the complainant and issued a cheque and the said cheque was dishonoured. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, the bail may be granted to the accused-petitioner.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and he knowingly issued the cheque in favour of the complainant, despite knowing the fact that the bank has already been merged with the other bank and the cheque would get dishonoured. It is also contended that the cheque was issued in favour of the complainant with dishonour intention, therefore, considering the above

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top