SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1116

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JAIPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN, J
HEMRAJ @ HEMU S/O SANJAY SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent


Advocates:
Mr. Navankur Dubey, Mr. N.S. Dhakad, PP

Order :

1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.140/2024 registered at Police Station Gahnoli Mod, District Bharatpur (Raj.) for the offence punishable under Section 392 of IPC.

2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged offence is triable by Magistrate. He further submits that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter. He argues that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner. He submits that petitioner is a habitual offender and six other cases have also been registered against him.

4. I have considered the contentions.

5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, especially the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in this matter; alleged offence is triable by Magistrate as w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top