SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 1147

Advocates:
Mr. S.S. Shaktawat with Mr. B.P.S Inda for Petitioner(s); Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat, Asst. to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG for Respondent(s)

Suspension of sentence granted based on contradictions in victim's statement and appellant's prior bail status.

Headnote:

(A) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - The appellant sought suspension of sentence based on contradictions in the victim's statement and the fact that he was on bail during the trial - The court found it a fit case for suspension of sentence. (Paras 1, 2, 3)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court imposed conditions for the appellant's bail, including regular appearance before the trial court and notification of any change in residence. (Paras 4, 5)

Facts of the case:
The appellant was convicted under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act and sought suspension of his sentence, arguing contradictions in the victim's statement and the lengthy appeal process.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the suspension of the sentence, emphasizing the appellant's prior bail status and the nature of the case.

Issues: The main issue was whether the contradictions in the victim's statement warranted the suspension of the sentence.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the contradictions in the victim's statement and the appellant's bail status during the trial justified the suspension of the sentence.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Assistant to Addl. Advocate General and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that according to the statement of victim, she clearly mentioned that she roamed with the appellant at so many places and during this period she did not raise any hue and cry and there are major contradictions, improvements and omission in her statement. The appellant was on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal will take sufficient long time. Therefore, the sentence may kindly be suspended.

3. Learned Assistant to Addl. Advocate General opposed the prayer made by the counsel for the appellant.

4. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant was on bail during the trial, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused appellant.

5. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. (430 BNSS) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence in the judgment dated 01.05.2024 passed by the learned Special Judge, Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act Cases, 2012 & Commission for Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005, NO.2, Udaipur, in Special Sessions Case No.26/2023 against the appellant-applicant Kantilal S/o Dhanna, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he will be released on bail, provided he executes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 26.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

6. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused-applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top