SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(RAJ) 654

HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J
SALMAN KHAN @ KALU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF RAJASTHAN – Respondent
SOSA / 1162 / 2024



Advocates:
Mr. Vikas Bijarnia, Mr. Kuldeep Singh Kumpawat, Asst. to Mr. Deepak Choudhary, AAG

The court may suspend a sentence if the appellant was on bail during trial and significant contradictions exist in the victim's statement.

Headnote:

(A) Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 - Section 389 - Suspension of sentence - The appellant sought suspension of sentence based on contradictions in the victim's statement and the duration of the appeal process - The court found it appropriate to suspend the sentence as the appellant was on bail during the trial. (Paras 1-4)

(B) Bail - Conditions for bail - The court imposed conditions for the appellant's bail, including appearance before the trial court annually and notification of any change of address. (Paras 5-7)

Facts of the case:
The appellant, convicted under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, sought suspension of his sentence, arguing inconsistencies in the victim's testimony and the lengthy appeal process.

Findings of Court:
The court deemed it fit to suspend the sentence, allowing the appellant to remain on bail under specified conditions.

Issues: The primary issue was whether the sentence should be suspended given the circumstances of the case and the appellant's prior bail status.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that the appellant's prior bail status and the nature of the contradictions in the victim's statement warranted the suspension of the sentence.

Result: Application for suspension of sentence allowed.

ORDER :

(MANOJ KUMAR GARG, J.)

Heard learned counsel for the appellant as well as learned Assistant to Addl. Advocate General and perused the material available on record.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that according to the statement of victim, she clearly mentioned that she roamed with the appellant at so many places and during this period she did not raise any hue and cry and there are major contradictions, improvements and omission in her statement. The appellant was on bail during the trial and hearing of the appeal will take sufficient long time.

3. Therefore, the sentence may kindly be suspended.

4. Learned Assistant to Addl. Advocate General opposed the prayer made by the counsel for the appellant.

5. Upon a consideration of the arguments advanced on behalf of the appellant and having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant was on bail during the trial, therefore, this Court is of the opinion that it is a fit case for suspending the sentences awarded to the accused appellant.

6. Accordingly, the application for suspension of sentence filed under Section 389 Cr.P.C. (430 BNSS) is allowed and it is ordered that the sentence in the judgment dated 17.08.2024 passed by the learned Court (Protection of Children from Sexual Offence Act Cases, 2012, Hanumangarh, in Sessions Case No.98/2018 against the appellant-applicant Salman Khan @ Kalu S/o Mohammad Ali, shall remain suspended till final disposal of the aforesaid appeal and he will be released on bail, provided he executes personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance in this court on 20.03.2025 and whenever ordered to do so till the disposal of the appeal on the conditions indicated below:-

1. That he/she/they will appear before the trial Court in the month of January of every year till the appeal is decided.

2. That if the applicant(s) changes the place of residence, he/she/they will give in writing his/her/their changed address to the trial Court as well as to the counsel in the High Court.

3. Similarly, if the sureties change their address(s), they will give in writing their changed address to the trial Court.

7. The learned trial Court shall keep the record of attendance of the accused-applicant(s) in a separate file. Such file be registered as Criminal Misc. Case related to original case in which the accused- applicant(s) was/were tried and convicted. A copy of this order shall also be placed in that file for ready reference. Criminal Misc. file shall not be taken into account for statistical purpose relating to pendency and disposal of cases in the trial court. In case the said accused applicant(s) does not appear before the trial court, the learned trial Judge shall report the matter to the High Court for cancellation of bail.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top