Back
HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN (JODHPUR BENCH)
VINIT KUMAR MATHUR
Gomati Devi W/o Shri Bastiram – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Colonization, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Jaipur – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present writ petitions are based on similar facts and the nature of dispute in the cases are similar as well, therefore, they are being disposed of by this common order.
3. For brevity, the facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12590/2024 are taken into consideration.
4. Briefly noted the facts involved in the present case are that the petitioner is an allottee/purchaser of certain land, which was allotted to her by the competent authority in the year 1987 invoking the provisions of the Rajasthan Colonisation (Allotment and Sale of Government Land in the Indira Gandhi Canal Colony Area) Rules, 1975 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of 1975’). The petitioner, who has been allotted the land, was originally in possession of a piece of land situated in Mahajan Field Firing Range. Due to the establishment of Mahajan Field Firing Range, the petitioner was required to vacate the land of that area and in order to compensate her dispossession from the Mahajan Field Firing Range, another allotment of land was made in her favour in the Chattargarh area (Khajuwala & Pugal areas in other connected matters) under the Rules of 1975.
After th
The court mandated timely decisions on pending applications for Khatedari rights, emphasizing fair hearing for all parties involved.
The court directed the Tehsildar to expeditiously decide pending applications for khatedari rights, emphasizing the importance of timely administrative action in land rights matters.
The court upheld the validity of land allotment under the Rajasthan Colonization Rules, confirming the authority of the Additional Commissioner to reject cancellation applications based on existing n....
As per Section 13(1) of the Act of 1954, there was a condition precedent that, if any khatedar transfers his rights or interest in land, then he shall get previous consent in writing from the State G....
A party's acceptance of prior court decisions and subsequent actions create estoppel, preventing challenges to those decisions based on conduct and acquiescence.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
