SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 1751

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
FARJAND ALI, J.
Shantilal - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondent
CRLMB No. 1967 of 2025
Decided On : 20-02-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. K.L.Thakur
For the Respondent: Mr. Vikram Singh Rajpuorhit, Dy.G.A.

Bail is the rule at the pre-conviction stage, and prolonged incarceration without trial is unjustified, emphasizing the right to a speedy trial.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 439 - Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 8/15 and Section 37 - Bail application - Accused-petitioner contended that no case was made out against him and incarceration was unwarranted - The court found that the prosecution failed to ensure the presence of key witnesses and acknowledged the right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution - The court emphasized that at a pre-conviction stage, bail is the rule and denial is the exception - Bail granted with conditions. (Paras 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5, 6, 7)

(B) Right to Speedy Trial - The court reiterated that prolonged incarceration without trial is unjustified and emphasized the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. (Paras 5, 6)

ORDER :

1. The jurisdiction of this court has been invoked by way of filing an application under Section 439 CrPC at the instance of accused-petitioner. The requisite details of the matter are tabulated herein below:

S. No.Particulars of the Case
1.FIR Number559/2023
2.Concerned Police StationChittorgarh
3.DistrictChittorgarh
4.Offences alleged in the FIRSection 8/15 of the NDPS Act
5.Offences added, if any--
6.Date of passing of impugned order26.02.2024

2. It is contended on behalf of the accused-petitioner that no case for the alleged offences is made out against him and his incarceration is not warranted. There are no factors at play in the case at hand that may work against grant of bail to the accused-petitioner and he has been made an accused based on conjectures and surmises.

3. Contrary to the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the bail application and submits that the present case is not fit for enlargement of accused on bail.

4. I have heard and considered the submissions made by both the parties and perused the material available on record.

4.1. Perusal of the record revealing that the petitioner was arrested in the month of November 2023 for having possession of 134 kg poppy husk. His previous bail application was dismissed by this Court vide order dated 06.05.2024 passed in SBCRLMB No.2838/2024 on the grounds of gravity of charge and fetter contained under Section 37 of the NDPS Act. The other grounds with regard to flouting the rules of 3, 8, 9 & 13 of the Rules of 2022. It would be worthwhile to mention here that by virtue of powers given under Section 52-A r.w. Section 76 of the NDPS Act, the Central Govt. Department of Finance issued a Gazette Notification dated 23.12.2022 regarding classification, seizing, sealing, storing, taking samples of the contraband etc. called as Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (seizure, search, sampling and disposal), Rules 2022 (hereinafter referred as ‘the Rules of 2022’). The said Rule came into force from 23.12.2022. It would be relevant to reproduce certain provisions, which are as under:-

3. Classification of seized material. –

(1) The narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and controlled substances seized under the Act shall be classified based on physical properties and results of the drug detection kit, if any, and shall be weighed separately.

(2) If the narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and controlled substances are found in packages or containers, such packages and containers shall be weighed separately and serially numbered for the purpose of identification.

(3) All narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and controlled substances found in loose form shall be packed in tamper proof bag or in container, which shall be serially numbered and weighed and the particular of drugs and the date of seizure shall also be mentioned on such bag or container:

Provided that bulk quantities of ganja, poppy straw may be packed in gunny bags and sealed in such way that it cannot be tempered with:

Provided further that seized concealing material such as trolley bags, backpack and other seized articles shall be sealed separately.

(4) The classification, weighing, packaging and numbering referred to in this sub-rule shall be done in the presence of search witnesses (Panchas) and the person from whose possession the drugs and substances was recovered and a mention to this effect shall invariably be made in the panchnama drawn on the spot of seizure.

(5) The detailed inventory of the packages, containers, conveyances and other seized articles shall be prepared and attached to the panchnama.

6. ………

7. ……..

8. Application to Magistrate. – After the seized material under the Act is forwarded to the officer-in- charge of the nearest police station or to the officer empowered under section 53 of the Act or if it is seized by such an officer himself, he shall prepare an inventory of such material in Form-4 and apply to the Magistrate, at the earliest, und

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top