SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Raj) 154

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J.
Smt. Meena Devi, W/o. Late Ramshnehi – Appellant
Versus
Rahul Haldiya, S/o. Shri Mahendra Kumar Sharma – Respondent
S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 3327 Of 2018
Decided On : 11-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. B.L. Dhakar
For the Respondent: Mr. Raaj Pal Choudhary

The court condoned a 450-day delay in appeal filing under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, emphasizing the need for supporting young advocates with welfare schemes for accessing necessary law resources.

Headnote:(A) Limitation Act - Section 5 - Application for condonation of delay - Delay of 450 days in filing appeal was condoned based on significant legal questions involved and the necessity of supporting young Advocates with resources - An amount of Rs. 11,000/- is to be deposited in the Junior Advocates Welfare Fund for purchasing law books as a condition for condonation of delay. (Paras 1, 3, 15)

(B) Access to legal resources - Importance of providing young lawyers, particularly those in the early years of practice, with necessary law books and support for their professional growth - A welfare scheme with provisions for financial aid for law book purchases is mandated to assist Junior Advocates aged below 28 years. (Paras 15, 18)

(C) Legal profession support - Court emphasizes the need for a strong support system for young professionals to ensure high standards within the legal field; practical challenges such as financial struggles and lack of mentorship are underscored in promoting a healthier legal system. (Paras 6, 10, 12)

Facts of the case:
The application seeks condonation of the delay in appeal filing due to the appellants' inability to contact their counsel, unaware of the prior judgment by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.

Findings of Court:
The court allowed the application to condone the delay subject to cost deposition for betterment of junior advocates.

Issues: The primary issues involved were the grounds for condoning a substantial delay in appeal filing and the welfare of young advocates in accessing necessary law resources.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that addressing significant questions of law and system challenges to support young advocates necessitates condonation of delays in appeals, emphasizing the importance of resources for their successful practice.

Result: Application allowed.

Table of Content
1. application for condonation of delay in appeal (Para 1 , 2)
2. challenges and needs of young advocates (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. establishment of junior advocates welfare fund (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 19)
4. compliance and reporting requirements (Para 20 , 21)

ORDER :

ANOOP KUMAR DHAND, J.

Support growth, respect young talent and help to create a legal system where every young budding lawyer feels confident and helpful.

1. Matter comes upon misc. application No. 1592/2018 filed by the applicant under Section 5 of the Limitation Act seeking condonation of 450 days delay in filing the appeal.

2. Counsel for the appellants submits that the appellants could not contact their counsel and as such they were unaware about the impugned judgment dated 10.01.2017 being passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Dausa (hereinafter referred to as ‘Tribunal’). Hence, the delay has occurred in filing the instant appeal and the same be condoned as the amount of compensation so awarded by the Tribunal is inadequate and the instant appeal has been filed by the appellants seeking enhancement of the amount of compensation.

3. This Court is not satisfied with the reasons/explanation given for the inordinate delay of 450 days but looking to the fact that important questions of law and facts are involved in this appeal, the application stands allowed subject to deposition of cost of Rs. 11,000/- in the “Junior Advocates Welfare Fund for purchasing Law Books” with the Rajasthan High Court Bar Association, Jaipur.

4. The reason for passing this order is that this Court is aware about the practical difficulties being faced by the young junior Advocates having practice of less than 5 years. The first generation young budding lawyers have no support to establish their practice and they have no resources to purchase the necessary law books, which are required by them every day.

5. Becoming a lawyer is a proud moment. After years of study, many young people enter courts with hope and confidence. They want to learn, grow, and serve justice. These new lawyers are often referred to as Young Advocates. Their journey starts with big dreams, but the reality of court life is not easy. Long working hours, low income, lack of space, and little guidance make the early years stressful. Young Advocates work hard every day. They prepare case files, read laws, assist seniors, and wait for long hours in courts. Still, their efforts often go unnoticed. A strong legal system needs strong Young Advocates. If they get proper support in the beginning, they can become honest and skilled professionals. Helping Young Advocates is not a favor. There is a need for a better justice system.

6. Young Advocates are lawyers who are in the first few years of their legal practice. This is the learning stage of their career. During this time, they understand court procedures, drafting, client handling, and professional behavior. The legal system depends heavily on these Young Advocates. They do research work, prepare documents, and support senior lawyers in court cases. They bring fresh thinking and new energy to the system. When Young Advocates grow well, courts work better. When they feel ignored, the system becomes weak. Supporting them helps build a strong future for law and justice.

7. Junior young lawyers, particularly first generation Advocates face significant hurdles in establishing their practice, which is further exacerbated by lack of access to necessary law books. Without access to necessary law books, they struggle to prepare cases efficiently. Many beginners cannot afford to purchase the necessary books; which can limit their independent growth and professional development.

8. Money problems are very common for Young Advocates. In the early years, income is not fixed. Some months pass without any earning. Daily expenses like travel, food, books, and rent continue to rise. Many Young Advocates depend on their families even after starti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top