SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Raj) 2410

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
REKHA BORANA
Kasa Ram Dangi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. P.D. Bohra

ORDER :

REKHA BORANA, J.

1. None appears for the respondents despite the service being complete.

2. The present writ petition has been filed aggrieved of order dated 29.11.2014 (Annexure-14) whereby the disciplinary authority proceeded on to impose a punishment of removal from service against the petitioner in terms of Rule 16 of the Rajasthan Civil Service (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1958 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the CCA Rules’).

3. The facts are that memorandum of charges was served on the petitioner on 20.11.2007 and he was called upon to file his defence qua the said charges. The inquiry officer as appointed at the first stage retired without initiating the inquiry proceedings and subsequent inquiry officers continued to be appointed. Ultimately, it is only in the year 2014 that the fifth inquiry officer as appointed, when called upon to submit the inquiry report within a period of 15 days, submitted the same on 20.11.2014. After the submission of said inquiry report, personal hearing was provided to the petitioner by the Managing Director of the Bank on 28.11.2014 and 29.11.2014.

4. On 29.11.2014, the disciplinary authority i.e. the Managing Director proceeded

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top