IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
UMA SHANKER VYAS, J.
Vaid Shri Devendra Prasad Bhatt S/o Late Shri Narhari Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
Lekha Bhatt W/o Late Ishan Chand Bhatt – Respondent
S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 278 of 2019
Decided On : 18-11-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case parties and the procedural context. (Para 1) |
| 2. discussion on interlocutory orders and claims. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
[2025:RJ-JP:46031]
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil First Appeal No. 278/2019
1. Vaid Shri Devendra Prasad Bhatt S/o Late Shri Narhari Bhatt, R/o Mandir Shri Dwarikadhish Ji Chaura Rasta, Jaipur (Deceased) Through Legal Representatives
1/1. Kirtishekhar S/o Late Shri Devendra Prasad Bhatt, R/o Mandir Shri Dwarikadhish Ji Chaura Rasta, Jaipur ---Defendant No.1/1 Versus RESPONDENTS :
1. Smt. Lekha Bhatt W/o Late Dr. Ishan Chand Bhatt.
2. Prateek Bhatt S/o Late Dr. Ishan Chand Bhatt.
3. Ambrish Bhatt S/o Late Dr. Ishan Bhatt (Deceased)
3/1- Shivangi Bhatt W/o Late Shkri Ambrish Bhatt.
3/2- Samriddhi Bhatt d/o Late Shkri Ambrish Bhatt. (Minor, through mother Shivangi Bhatt)
--Plaintiffs Proforma Respondents
4. Rajeshwar S/o Late Shri Devendra Prasad Bhatt, Resident Of House No. 503, Opp. Shaillo Ki Gali, Gangapuri Bazar, Jaipur.
5. Smt. Pratibha Dixit W/o Shri Rajendra Dixit D/o Late Vaid Shri Devendra Prasad Bhatt, Resident Of L-42, Sattelite Park, Jodhpur Char Rasta, Ahmedabad, Gujarat
6. Smt. Jaimala W/o Shri Hitesh Gupta D/o Late Vaid Devendra Prasad Bhatt, Resident Of 23, Arvind Park, Tonk Road, Near Central School, Jaipur (4, 5 And 6 Are Legal Representatives Of Defendant No. 1-Vaid Shri Devendra Prasad Bhatt S/o Late Shri Narhari Bhatt)
-------Defendant No.1/2, 1/3 & 1/4 For Appellant(s) : Mr. R. K. Agarwal, Sr. Adv.
Ms. Sunita Pareek, Adv.
Mr. Adhiraj Modi, Adv.
For : Mr. G. P. Sharma, Adv.
Respondent(s) Mr. M. C. Gupta, Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS
Judgment / Order
14/11/2025 i. The date of conclusion of arguments:
14/11/2025 ii. The date on which the judgment was reserved:
iii. Whether the full judgment or Full Judgment only the operative part was pronounced:
iv. The date of pronouncement: 18/11/2025
1- vihykFkhZ&izfroknh ¼vkxs **izfroknh^^ dgk tk;sxk½ }kjk ;g flfoy izFke vihy vra xZr /kkjk 96 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k Øe&2] t;iqj egkuxj }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&114@2004 esa ikfjr fu.kZ; o fMØh fnukad 09-01-2019 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izR;FkhZx.k&oknhx.k ¼vkxs ^^oknhx.k** dgk tk;sxk½ dh vksj ls izLrqr okn ckcr~ dCtk izkfIr o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk izfroknh ds fo:) fuEukuqlkj fMØh fd;k x;k%& ^^ifj.kker% oknhx.k dk okn fo:) izfroknhx.k ckcr~ fnyok;s tkus dCtk ,oa LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk Lohdkj fd;k tkdj vkns'k fn;k tkrk gS fd izfroknhx.k oknxzLr laifRr dk 'kkafriw.kZ dCtk vkns'k dh frfFk ls nks ekg esa oknhx.k dks laHkyok;s rFkk mDr fookfnr laifRr ij fdlh izdkj dk LFkk;h fuekZ.k] ifjorZu o gLrkarj.k djus ls 'kk'or :i ls ckt jgsA [kpkZ i{kdkjku~ viuk&viuk Lo;a ogu djsaxsA rn~uqlkj fMØh ipkZ eqfrZc gksA**
2- fo}ku vf/koDrk oknhx.k rFkk izfroknh dh cgl lquh x;h] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA
3- lqlxa r rF; ;g gS fd izfroknh l[a ;k&1 oS| Jh nsosUnzizlkn HkV~V ds T;s"B iq= MkW bZ'kku pUn HkV~V dh iRuh oknh la[;k&1 rFkk iq=x.k oknh la[;k&2 o 3 }kjk okn izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd MkW bZ'kku pUn HkV~V us vius thoudky esa fnukad 30-12-1971 dks Hkw[k.M l[a ;k&10 7]000@&:i;s esa iathd`r foØ; foys[k ds ek/;e ls [kjhn dj dCtk izkIr fd;k] ftls fnukad 19-07-1972 ds foØ; i= ds ek/;e ls jkedU;k o jk/ks';ke dks foØ; dj fn;kA blh izdkj MkW bZ'kku pUn HkV~V us fnukad 22-12-1971 dks Hkw[k.M la[;k&21 ¼vkxs ^^oknxzLr Hkw[k.M** dgk tk;sxk½ dks [kjhnus dk lkSnk dj dCtk izkIr fd;k] ftlds laca/k esa fnukad 10-07- 1972 dks foØ; i= fu"ikfnr gvq k rFkk fnukad 11-07-1972 dks ;g nLrkost iathd`r gqvkA
4- Hkw[k.M la[;k&10 ds laca/k esa dksbZ fookn ugha gS] vr% ml ij vf/kd foospu dh vko';drk ugha gSA oknxzLr Hkw[k.M la[;k&21 ds laca/k esa oknhx.k dk ;g vfHkdFku gS fd ;g Hkw[k.M MkW bZ'kku pUn HkV~V us [kjhn fd;k Fkk rFkk blds mRrj esa MkW bZ'kku pUn HkV~V ds firk oS| Jh nsosUnzizlkn }kjk Hkw[k.M la[;k&22 [kjhn dj dCtk izkIr fd;kA nksuksa Hkw[k.M Øe'k% iq= o firk ds Fks] vr% ,d lkFk vkgrs dk fuekZ.k djok;k x;kA MkW bZ'kku pUn HkV~V us fnukad 17
Judicial discretion allows for claims of mesne profits and user charges at the final hearing while maintaining the integrity of interlocutory orders.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.