Back
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR
NUPUR BHATI, J.
Paras Banjara S/o Shri Dhagla Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 19978 of 2025
Decided On : 14-10-2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. pending petition status quo on property (Para 1) |
| 2. issuance of notice and status quo maintenance (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. connection with similar pending case (Para 4) |
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel representing the petitioners submits that in an identical controversy, Coordinate Bench vide order dated 28.07.2025 in SBCWP No. 13443/2025, Rakesh Kumar & Ors. v. State of Rajasthan & Ors., has granted interim order for maintaining status quo, as it exists today, with respect to property, while issuing the notices to the respondents. The order reads as under:
“Heard.
Issue notice of the writ petition as well as stay application, returnable within a period of three weeks.
The learned cuonsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out the notices “Dasti” for effective service upon the respondents.
In the meanwhile, the status-quo, existing as of today regarding the property of the petitioners, shall be maintained.
List the matter on 28.08.2025.”
2. In view of the above, issue notice of the writ petition along with the stay application to the respondents.
3. In the meanwhile and until next date, status quo, as it exists today, with respect to property in question, shall be maintained.
4. Connect with SBCWP No.13443/2025, as prayed.
The court ruled that maintaining the status quo regarding property is essential to ensure legal consistency until similar legal matters are resolved.
The court has the authority to issue specific directions to maintain the status quo and prevent changes in disputed properties during the pendency of an interlocutory application.
The court emphasized the necessity of enforcing interim orders and provided guidance on using police assistance for compliance in cases of ongoing violations.
Trial courts must specify possession in status quo orders to prevent ambiguity and ensure effective implementation.
Court emphasizes the requirement of notifying intentions to create third-party rights in property pending adjudication of application, upholding status quo.
The appeal under Section 207 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, lies against the order of status-quo, rendering the revision filed under Section 210 not maintainable.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
