Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Virendra Kumar S/o Shri Mahaveer Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Instant Writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following prayer:-
1. That impugned order dated 11.03.2019 (Annexure-7) by which the candidature of the petitioner has been cancelled may kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.
2. That the respondents may be directed that the petitioner may be considered eligible for appointment to the post of Constable Recruitment as per his merit and the order dated 11.03.2019 may be directed to not come in the way of petitioner for appointment.
3. That the action of the respondents in depriving the petitioner from appointment to the post of constable on grounds of criminal case may kindly be held illegal and arbitrary and he may be given appointment on the post of constable as per his merit with all consequential benefits. 4. Any other appropriate order, which may be found just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, be passed in favour of the petitioner.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that the controversy raised herein is no more res integra as same has been decided by the Division Bench of this Hon’ble Court in case of Babbal Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 971/2022
Failure to disclose material information and approach the court with clean hands can render a writ petition not maintainable.
Denial of appointment based on the pendency of FIR requires the candidate to be named in the FIR, summoned, or charge-sheeted.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
