SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(HP) 230

RAJIV SHARMA
Jagat Ram Chauhan – Appellant
Versus
Avinash Partap – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Bimal Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Nemo.

JUDGMENT

Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.

This revision petition is directed against the judgment dated 16.12.2013 passed by the Appellate Authority (II) Sirmaur District at Nahan in Rent Appeal No. 13-N/14 of 2012.

2. “Key facts” necessary for the adjudication of this petition are that respondents-landlords (hereinafter referred to as the “landlords” for convenience sake) filed petition under section 14 of the Himachal Pradesh Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 for the eviction of petitioner-tenant (hereinafter referred to as the “tenant” for convenience sake) from the disputed shop. The shop is located in Khasra No.278 of Mohal Dhabon, Mohalla Telian, Katcha Tank, Nahan. It was let out to tenant 21-22 years ago on monthly rent of Rs.550/-besides other charges. It was let out for commercial purpose. Tenant is using the same as workshop for repairing the vehicles. Eviction was sought by the landlords on the ground that tenant was in arrears of rent and the premises were required bona fide for major repairs and alterations and for their own personal use and occupation. They intended to dismantle the partition wall between the aforesaid two shops in possession of tenant and another tenant Madan












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top