SATYEN VAIDYA
SUBHASH CHAND, SON OF LATE SH. RAKHA RAM – Appellant
Versus
SATYA DEVI, WIDOWOF LATE SH. BALBIR – Respondent
ORDER :
By way of instant petition, petitioner has challenged order dated 14.11.2019 passed by learned Civil Judge, Court No. IV, Shimla, in case No. 72-1/2018, whereby an application of the petitioner for framing of additional issues was rejected.
2. Petitioner, who is plaintiff before the learned Trial Court, has filed above noted suit with following prayers: -
(b) That a decree for possession may be passed pertaining to land and built up structure existing thereon.
(c) That the defendants being in unauthorized possession of the suit property may be held liable to pay use and occupation charges at the rate of Rs. 20,000/- per month from the date of filing suit till further orders and delivery of possession.
3. The petitioner has filed the suit on the premise that the suit land was owned by his father late Sh. Rakha Ram, who had died on 26.05.1959. During life time of Rakha Ram, suit land was recorded in his ownership and possession. However, during
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.