TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, VIRENDER SINGH
Ramesh Verma Son Sh. Ramanand Verma – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The instant petition has been filed for grant of the following substantive reliefs:-
II. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to give effect to Annexure P-4 vide which permission to Respondent No.3 has been given by Respondent No.2; or/and
III. Issue a writ of certiorari thereby quashing and setting aside the Annexure P-3 vide which the Respondent No.2 considered the application of Respondent No.3 in malafide and arbitrary manner in minutes of 42nd meeting; or/and
IV. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to give effect to Annexure P-3 vide which the Respondent No.2 considered the application of respondent No.3 in malafide and arbitrary manner in minutes of 42nd meeting; or/and
V. Directing Respondent No.1 to take action against the Respondent No.2 as the Respondent No.2 has not complied with the provision of the Himachal Pradesh Ground Water Act 2005 in right and legal manner.”
2. This Court at an early occasion dealt with an issue of ground water in CWP No. 1809/2018 in case title
Chandra Kishore Jha vs. Mahavir Prasad
Dhananjaya Reddy vs. State of Karnataka
Deep Chand vs. State of Rajasthan
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs. Essar Power Limited
Rao Shiv Bahadur Singh and anr. vs. State of Vindh-P
Ramana Dayaram Shetty vs. International Airport Authority of India and others (1979) 3 SCC 489
State of Uttar Pradesh vs. Singhara Singh and Ors
State of Jharkhand & Ors vs. Ambay Cements and anr. (2005) 1 SCC 368
Uddar Gagan Properties Ltd. vs. Sant Singh and Ors. 2016 (5) JT 389
Zuari Cement Ltd vs. Regional Director, ESIC, Hyderabad & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.