CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Nishant Son of Shri Ashok Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”) for quashing of F.I.R No.119 of 2020 dated 18.9.2020 under Sections 279, 337 and 338 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 181 of the Motor Vehicles Act, registered at Police Station Manali, District Kullu, alongwith all consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stated the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that on 18.9.2020 around 11:00 a.m., when respondent No.2 was going to his shop near Gurudwara, petitioner drove a vehicle bearing registration No.HP-58B-1991 in a rash and negligent manner so as to endanger human life and personal safety of others, struck against him, as a result of which, respondent No.2 sustained injuries. On the basis of the aforesaid information given by the complainant, the instant FIR came to be lodged. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise deed (Annexure P-2) stating therein that the complainant does not want to pursue the case against the petitioner. Hence, the present p
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others ((1998) 5 SCC 749
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.