CHANDER BHUSAN BAROWALIA
Rukam Deen S/o. Sh. Umar Baksh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The present petition is maintained by the petitioner under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter to be called as “the Code”) for quashing of F.I.R No.117 of 2016 dated 26.6.2016 under Section 324 and Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, registered at Police Station Amb, District Una, H.P. alongwith all consequential proceedings arising out of the said F.I.R., pending before the learned trial Court.
2. Briefly stated the facts, giving rise to the present petition, as per the prosecution story, are that respondent No.4/complainant made a complaint before the police alleging therein that on 26.6.2016 around 9:00 a.m., petitioner voluntarily causing hurt to her with a sharp edged weapon, as a result of which, respondent No.4 sustained grievous injuries. On the basis of statement of the complainant, FIR in question was registered. Now, the parties have entered into a compromise, vide Compromise deed (Annexure P-5) stating therein that the complainant does not want to pursue the case against the petitioner. Hence, the present petition.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has argued that as the parties have compromised the matter, no purpose will be served b
B.S. Joshi and others vs. State of Haryana and another
Pepsi Food Ltd. and another v. Special Judicial Magistrate and others (1998) 5 SCC 749
Preeti Gupta and another vs. State of Jharkhand and another
Inder Mohan Goswami and Another v. State of Uttaranchal & Others
Jitendra Raghuvanshi and others vs. Babita Raghuvanshi and another
Parbatbhai Aahir alias Parbatbhai Bhimsinhbhai Karmur and others vs. State of Gujarat and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.