SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 761

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Ram Chand – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Sanket Sankhyan.
For the Respondents: Sumesh Raj, Dinesh Thakur, Sanjeev Sood, Amit Kumar Dhumal, K.D. Shreedhar, Shreya Chauhan.

JUDGMENT :

AJAY MOHAN GOEL, J.

1. With the consent of the parties, all these five petitions are being disposed of by a common order. In all these petitions, the prayer is to extend the time for completion of the arbitral proceedings so as to enable learned Arbitral Tribunal to pass the Award.

2. The arbitral disputes arise out of the land acquisition in District Bilaspur, H.P. for the purpose of construction of the National Highway, land for which has been acquired under the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956. The land of the petitioners has been acquired in these cases in terms of the following awards:

(a)

Arbitration Case No. 126 of 2022

Award No. 17/1 of 2013-14, dated 31.12.2013.

(b)

Arbitration Case No. 127 of 2022

Award No. 17/1 of 2013/14, dated 31.12.2013.

(c)

Arbitration Case No. 141 of 2022

Award No. 19/2 of 2013-14, dated 10.09.2014.

(d)

Arbitration Case No. 142 of 2022

Award No. 19/2 of 2013-14, dated 10.09.2014.

(e)

Arbitration Case No. 143 of 2022

Award No. 19/2 of 2013-14, dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top