SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 127

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Rama Nand – Appellant
Versus
Krishan Dass – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. Vijay Singh Bhatia.
For the Respondents: Mr. Ishan Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J.

Appellant has approached this Court against judgment and decree dated 15.1.2020, passed in Civil Appeal No. 52-13/2017, titled as Krishan Dass and others Vs. Rama Nand and others by Additional District Judge, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh, whereby judgment and decree dated 7.10.2017, passed in Civil Suit No. 121-1 of 2017/12, titled as Rama Nand Vs. Krishan Dass and others by Civil Judge Court No. 3, Ghumarwin, District Bilaspur, H.P. has been reversed and suit preferred by respondent No. 1 Rama Nand seeking permanent prohibitory injunction by restraining the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from his share from the suit land, has been dismissed.

2. Appellant Rama Nand is plaintiff, whereas respondents No. 1 to 3 and performa respondent No. 4 are defendants in the suit and they shall, herein after for convenience, be referred as per their status in the Civil Suit.

3. Plaintiff had preferred a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants. Defendant No. 2 Ghan Shyam did not contest the suit and was proceeded against ex parte, whereas other defendants had contested the suit, who are respondents herein.

4. Civi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top