SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(JK) 258

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
RAJ KUMARI AND OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
LAKHMI CHAND – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The civil suit came to be commenced by three plaintiffs, namely, Raj Kumari, Sham Parsad, Jagdish Kumar against Lakhmi Chand. The suit so filed by the said three plaintiffs came to be on file No. 210/Civil of 2006 before the court of Sub Judge, Poonch.

3. Through the medium of the suit, the said three plaintiffs sought a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining said sole defendant-Lakhmi Chand with respect to suit land measuring 7 marlas in khasra No. 1565/3 new (3014/772 old) forming subject matter of sale deed dated 09.10.1969 and land measuring 9 marlas comprised in khasra No. 1566/1 in located in City Poonch.

4. The suit went to contest generating the following issues:

“Issue No. 1 - Whether the injunction suit in present form against co-sharer/co-owner is not maintainable? (OPD)

Issue No. 2- Whether this suit of plaintiffs is hit by the principle of Resjudicate. (OPD)

Issue No. 3- Whether plaintiffs are in possession of half share in suit land i.e. land measuring seven marlas in Kh. No. 1563/3 and one marla in Kh. No. 1566/1 situated at Poonch City? (OPP)

Issue No. 4- Whether ancestral kaccha house which is existin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top