SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 153

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Ajay Sharma – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr.Vijay Chaudhary, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr.Dinesh Thakur, adv.

JUDGMENT :

Vivek Singh Thakur, J

Petitioner has approached this Court seeking direction to respondent to release all consequential benefits, i.e. seniority, pay fixation, monetary benefits alongwith 12% interest per annum to the petitioner at par with Assistant Engineers (Civil) appointed as per merit in the Select List dated 16.11.2004, prepared and recommended by Commission to the respondent-Department, from due date, i.e. since November, 2004.

2. On request of Irrigation and Public Health Department (I&PH) of Government of Himachal Pradesh, Public Service Commission (Commission) initiated recruitment process by issuing Advertisement No.II of 2003, inviting applications from eligible candidates for various posts, including six posts, of Assistant Engineers (Civil) Gazetted Class-I. Out of these six posts five posts were reserved for ‘general ex-servicemen’ and one for ‘Scheduled Caste ex-serviceman’ (backlog). Interviews for filling up these posts were conducted on 6th, 7th and 8th January, 2004 by the Selection Committee constituted by the Commission. Names of these candidates, including petitioner, were recommended, however a controversy was raised regarding these recommendations,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top