SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(HP) 879

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN
Parmodh Singh S/o Late Shri Chaini Ram – Appellant
Versus
Madan Lal S/o Late Shri Bhagat Ram – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Ashok Kumar Thakur.

ORDER :

1. The plaintiff-petitioner has filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction for restraining the defendants, their servants, legal representatives and assignees and other from dispossessing the plaintiff or cutting khair trees and other valuable trees during the pendency of the suit.

2. The plaintiff-petitioner filed an application for appointment of local commissioner on the ground that it was necessary to appoint local commissioner in order to elucidate how much and in what manner the defendants have occupied the suit land. It was further contended that the defendants-respondents had cut the khair trees over the suit land and removed the boundary wall, as a result whereof the applicant had been dispossessed from the portion of the suit land. Thus, in order to know that how much of the area has now been illegally occupied by the respondents-defendants, the appointment of the local commissioner is absolutely necessary.

3. The application so filed by the petitioner-plaintiff was contested by the defendants-respondents and in their reply, it is submitted that they had sought for demarcation and obtained report on 20.07.2003 through Tehsildar which was confirmed by SDM on 05

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top