IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
Sonia Sangwan W/o Shri Navneet Singh Sangwan – Petitioner
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
Criminal Misc. Petition (Main) No. 1145 of 2022
Decided On : 29-06-2022
Bail - Misappropriation of Scholarship Funds - IPC 409, 419, 465, 466, 471 - Prevention of Corruption Act 13(1)(c), 13(1)(d), 13(2)
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner was arrested for her alleged involvement in misappropriation of government scholarship funds. The case involved complicity of officials from the Education department, Central Government, Banks, and private institutions. The petitioner sought bail, arguing that the investigation was slow and her role was limited.
Finding of the Court:
The court observed that while the case involved serious socio-economic offences, the investigation had been ongoing for over two years and the petitioner had cooperated. The court granted bail, emphasizing that continued custodial interrogation was unnecessary and imposing stringent conditions to ensure the petitioner's cooperation with the investigation.
Issues: The main issue was whether the petitioner should be granted bail considering the nature of the allegations and the ongoing investigation.
Ratio Decidendi: The court balanced the seriousness of the allegations with the petitioner's right to liberty, emphasizing that the grant of bail cannot be thwarted solely based on the gravity of the offence. It also highlighted the need to protect the petitioner's rights and the consequences of pretrial detention.
Final Decision: The court allowed the bail petition and ordered the petitioner's release on bail, subject to stringent conditions to ensure cooperation with the investigation.
ORDER :
1. Vide R.C. No. 0962019S0002, a case has been registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation (for short CBI) under Sections 409, 419, 465, 466, 471 of the Indian Penal Code (in short IPC) and Sections 13 (1) (c) and 13 (1) (d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act at Police Station CBI, ACB Branch, Shimla. Petitioner was arrested in this case on 14.05.2022. A bail petition preferred by her under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure was dismissed by learned Special Judge (CBI), Shimla on 19.05.2022. Through instant petition, she seeks her release on regular bail.
2. Gist of Allegations.
The aforementioned case is in respect of alleged misappropriation of government scholarship funds on large scale with complicity of officials working in the Education department, Central Government, Banks and private institutions:
(ii) Pursuant to notification dated 20.03.2019, the FIR dated 16.11.2018 was entrusted to CBI and case RC-0962019S0002 was registered on 07.05.2019 at CBI, ACB, Shimla under Sections 409, 419, 465, 466 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code against unknown persons. After entrustment of FIR, CBI carried out investigations. Noticing the complicity of public servants of Directorate of Higher Education, Bank Officials and Officials of the private educational institutions, Sections 13(2) read with 13(1)(c) and 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, were added in the case. CBI conducted searches of 22 private institutions, which had disbursed the scholarships, w.e.f. 13.05.2019 to 16.05.2019 at 22 locations in the States of Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Punjab and Union Territory of Chandigarh. 26 institutions were taken up for investigation by the CBI on the basis of their scholarship claims.
(iii) Charge sheets for misappropriation of scholarship funds for different amount in respect of seven institutes stand filed by the C.B.I. Present petition pertains to Vidya Jyoti Educational Society, Dera Bassi, Punjab.
(iv) During investigation, it came out that the Vidya Jyoti Educational Society, Dera Bassi, Punjab had dishonestly claimed an amount of Rs. 14.41 crores for the students of SC/ST/OBC categor
Jayendra Saraswathi Swamigal vs. State of Tamil Nadu
P. Chidambaram vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Rohit Tandon vs. Directorate of Enforcement
State of U.P. through CBI vs. Amarmani Tripathi
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
The grant of bail should consider the gravity of the offence, the accused's right to liberty, and the need to protect the accused's rights, even in cases involving serious allegations.
Bail in economic offenses requires balancing public interest against individual rights; pre-trial detention must be justified beyond seriousness of charges.
Bail – On the basis of charges framed, court is only required to ascertain nature of crime – Court has not to adjudicate on elements of crime or charges to find out its nature, extent and depth.
The main legal point established is that bail is the rule and jail is the exception, and the decision to grant bail should consider the seriousness of the charge and the severity of the punishment.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.