Parveen Kumar vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(HP) 458

AJAY MOHAN GOEL
Parveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, Mr. Rahul, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Adv

JUDGMENT :

Ajay Mohan Goel, J.

CMPT No.946 of 2023

For the reasons stated therein, present application seeking early hearing of the petition is allowed and disposed of.

CWPOA No.3296 of 2020

2. By way of this petition the petitioner has, inter alia, prayed for the following relief:

“(i) That the office order dated 20.12.2017 at Annexure A-11 issued by respondent No.3 may kindly be quashed and set aside and the applicant may kindly be permitted to continue as Language Teacher (LT) on contract basis with the respondent.”

3. Brief facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are that the petitioner participated in the process that was undertaken by the respondent-department in the year 2017 for appointment as Language Teacher on contract basis. In terms of Annexure P5, dated 01.09.2017, the petitioner was reflected as a selected candidate. However, thereafter, a notice was issued to the petitioner dated 27.11.2017 (Annexure A7), which reads as under:

“In continuation of this office Order No.EDNHMR (Elem.)EV/ Apptt./2017/32450496 dated 1.9.2017 and modification No.: Even34317320 dated 8.9.2017 vide which you were appointed as LT in Gen. IRDP category and posted at GSSS Tikkar K

Click Here to Read the rest of this document