Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
JIYA LAL BHARDWAJ
Manju Kumari – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges appointment based on qualification dates. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. seniority claimed via earlier b.ed. and ncte priority. (Para 4 , 5 , 9) |
| 3. batch from ba date per note (i) pre-31.03.2014. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. rules specify qualifications, tet, batch reckoning criteria. (Para 8 , 10) |
| 5. batch seniority reckoned from ba issuance date. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. recruitment process initiated december 2013, completed 2014. (Para 13) |
| 7. petition lacks merit, dismissed without costs. (Para 14 , 15) |
The petitioner by way of present writ petition, has challenged the appointment of private respondent No.6 to the post of Language Teacher (Ortho) under the Reserved Category of Persons with Disabilities, made vide office order dated 21.06.2014.
2. The precise grouse raised by the petitioner in the writ petition is that the petitioner had obtained the qualification of Bachelor of Arts in the year 2009 and thereafter did her Bachelor of Education (B.Ed.) in the year 2010. Thereafter, she qualified the Teachers Eligibility Test (TET) in the year 2013.
3. So far as private respondent No.6 is concerned, he completed his Bachelor of Arts in the year 1999.
For batch-wise teacher recruitment up to 31.03.2014, inter se seniority reckoned from basic degree (B.A.) certificate date per Note (i), not professional qualification (B.Ed.) date.
The amendment to the recruitment rules requiring batch recognition from the B.Ed issuance date does not violate constitutional rights and is justified based on the necessity of complete qualification....
Employment and Service matter - Post of contractual Hindi Teacher - Petitioner has got the basic qualification and training qualification along with B.Ed. from Jammu University, his application shoul....
State authorities have broad discretion to set educational qualifications for public service positions, and courts will not interfere unless there are statutory violations.
The court affirmed that eligibility criteria for reserved positions must be strictly adhered to, ruling against the appointment of an ineligible candidate.
The main legal point established is that for the appointment of a teacher in a specific subject, a specialized degree in that subject, not a subsidiary one, is required as per the advertisement stipu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the qualifications required for appointment as a trained Teacher in Secondary School do not necessarily mandate a specific graduation subject,....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
