IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, JJ.
Thakur Pre-Examination Coaching-cum-Training Institute and Another – Petitioners
Versus
State of H.P. and Others – Respondents
C.W.P. No. 7339 of 2023
Decided On : 22-12-2023
Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course - Impugned Notification - The Himachal Pradesh Para-Veterinary Council Act 2010, The Himachal Pradesh Para-Veterinary Council Rules 2011 - The impugned decision of the State in capping the intake of students in the Para-Veterinary Course for session 2023-2025 as contained in the Notification dated 26.06.2023, is within the statutory competence mandated to the State under the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council Act 2010 and the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council Rules 2011. The procedure prescribed under the Act & the Rules framed thereunder has been followed for taking the decision. The impugned decision of the State in capping the intake of students in the Para-Veterinary Pharmacist Course for session 2023-2025 as conveyed in the Notification dated 26.06.2023 is based upon a thorough consideration of the corresponding report & recommendations made in that regard by the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council. The Notification dated 26.06.2023 gives out sound justification for taking the impugned decision/direction. The factual basis of the assigned reasons has otherwise not even been questioned by the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, a private training institute running Veterinary Pharmacist Course, challenged the decision to restrict the seats of Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course in already running private institutions to 45. The petitioner sought to fill 100 seats for the academic year 2023-2025.
Finding of the Court:
The impugned decision of the State in capping the intake of students in the Para-Veterinary Course for session 2023-2025 is within the statutory competence mandated to the State under the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council Act 2010 and the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council Rules 2011. The procedure prescribed under the Act & the Rules framed thereunder has been followed for taking the decision. The impugned decision of the State in capping the intake of students in the Para-Veterinary Pharmacist Course for session 2023-2025 as conveyed in the Notification dated 26.06.2023 is based upon a thorough consideration of the corresponding report & recommendations made in that regard by the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council. The Notification dated 26.06.2023 gives out sound justification for taking the impugned decision/direction. The factual basis of the assigned reasons has otherwise not even been questioned by the petitioner.
Issues: The petitioner challenged the decision to restrict the seats of Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course in already running private institutions to 45 and sought to fill 100 seats for the academic year 2023-2025.
Ratio Decidendi: The impugned decision of the State in capping the intake of students in the Para-Veterinary Course for session 2023-2025 is within the statutory competence mandated to the State under the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council Act 2010 and the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council Rules 2011. The procedure prescribed under the Act & the Rules framed thereunder has been followed for taking the decision. The impugned decision of the State in capping the intake of students in the Para-Veterinary Pharmacist Course for session 2023-2025 as conveyed in the Notification dated 26.06.2023 is based upon a thorough consideration of the corresponding report & recommendations made in that regard by the H.P. Para-Veterinary Council. The Notification dated 26.06.2023 gives out sound justification for taking the impugned decision/direction. The factual basis of the assigned reasons has otherwise not even been questioned by the petitioner.
Final Decision: The Court found no merit in the writ petition and dismissed the same.
JUDGMENT :
JYOTSNA REWAL DUA, J.
1. On 26.06.2023, the respondent-State notified a policy concerning running of Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course through private training institutes. Following decisions taken by the State were notified in this policy:
(ii) Seats of Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course in the already running Private Institutions will be restricted to 40 Seats + 05 (12%) seats for in service Departmental candidates from the academic session of 2023-25.
(iii) Private Veterinary Pharmacist Training Institutes will not change the fee structure compared to academic session 2022-24. Private Institutes shall display the fee structure on the notice board at all times and on the prospectus.
(iv) Entry level qualification of 10+2 Medical (Physics, Chemistry & Biology) will be made compulsory and admission will be based on merit with minimum 55% qualifying marks in 10+2 in the Medical Examination. The Recruitment and Promotion Rules of post will also be suitably amended as far as qualification is concerned. It is, however, made clear that the candidates who have Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course OR are undergoing Veterinary Pharmacist Training before the notification of this Policy shall also be eligible to apply for the post of Veterinary Pharmacist or its equivalent as notified by the Animal Husbandry Department.
(iv) Private Training Institutes shall be inspected on quarterly basis by the H.P. State Veterinary Council or an officer nominated by it in association with the Director, Animal Husbandry, who will not be below the rank of Deputy Director (AH/B). In case of short comings allotted (40) seats may be reduced or permission may be withdrawn by the HP State Para-Veterinary Council as the case may be after giving due opportunity of being heard to the Inspected Institute.
(v) Candidates undergoing Veterinary Pharmacist Training shall undergo minimum six months of mandatory practical training as provided in the approved syllabus for the purpose. The training will be undertaken in a Government Animal Husbandry Departmental Hospital/Farm. A nominal fee, to be decided by H.P. State Para-Veterinary Council, will be charged from trainees, which will be deposited in Pashu Rogi Kalyan Samitis, constituted at the District level.”
Petitioner, a private training institute running Veterinary Pharmacist Course, has challenged decision number (ii) whereby seats of Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course in the already running private institutions have been restricted to 45 in all. The prayer clause of the petition is as under:
“(a) To issue a writ of certiorari to quash the notification dated 26.06.2023 (Annexure P-15) pursuant to which the petitioner Institute has been permitted to ill 40+5 seats in veterinary pharmacists course for the Session 2023-25 batch 2023-2025 in relation to veterinary pharmacists 2 years Diploma Course.
(b) To issue writ or order directing the respondent to allow the petitioner Institute to fill 100 seats for the academic year 2023-2025 in relation to Veterinary Pharmacists 2 years Diploma......”
2. Facts about commencement of Veterinary Pharmacist Training Course in the petitioner institute and its permitted student strength:
(i)(a) The petitioner set up an institute and applied to the government to run Veterinary Pharmacist two years training course for Session 2017-2019. It also sought issuance of mandatorily required Essentiality Certificate to impart such training course for the years 2017-2019. The State did not respond. Hence the petitioner instituted CWP No. 1591 of 2017. This petition was disposed of on 02.05.2018 with direction to the State to conduct inspection of the petitioner institute in accordance with law and thereafter to take appropriate decision. The operative portion of the judgment goes as under:
“4. In view of above, as mutually agreed, this petition is
Dr. Basavaiah vs. Dr. H.L. Ramesh and Others
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Registrar vs. Sangam Laxmi Bai Vidyapeeth and Others
Scope of judicial review when examining policy of government is to check whether it violates fundamental rights of citizen or is opposed to any statutory provisions or manifestly arbitrary.
Scope of judicial review when examining policy of government is to check whether it violates fundamental rights of citizen or is opposed to any statutory provisions or manifestly arbitrary.
Education Law - Enhancement of seats - As per norms of Kerala University of Health Sciences, maximum seat capacity fixed for B.Sc. (MLT) is 30 - Expert Committee did not recommend for granting no-obj....
The State lacks competence to impose a ban on NOCs for educational institutes via executive order, which violates fundamental rights under Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
Opening of new Pharmacy Colleges – Merely because an institution has a right to establish an educational institution does not mean that such an application has to be allowed – In a particular area, i....
Locus standi is essential for invoking the jurisdiction of the court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. A petitioner must demonstrate legal injury to challenge an act or omission.
The court established that institutions must seek prior approval for admissions beyond the prescribed quota, but students may have legitimate expectations based on past practices.
It is clear that for maintaining standards of education in schools, NCTE is now specifically empowered to determine qualifications of persons for being recruited as teachers in schools or colleges.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.