SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(HP) 424

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Naresh Goyal – Appellant
Versus
Hemlata Sharma – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Navneet K. Bhalla.
For the Respondents: Sudhir Thakur, Somesh Sharma.

JUDGMENT :

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, J.

1. Present Revision Petition, invoking provisions of Section 24 (5) of the H.P. Urban Rent Control Act, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rent Act’), has been preferred against judgment dated 4.1.2023 passed by Appellate Authority-III, Solan in Rent Appeal No. 4ADJ-II/14 of 2022, titled as Naresh Goyal vs. Hemlata Sharma, whereby order of eviction dated 14.6.2022, passed by Rent Controller, Solan in Rent Case No. 20/2 of 2014, titled as Hemlata Sharma vs. Naresh Goyal, ordering eviction of tenant from the demised preemies, has been affirmed.

2. For convenience, parties hereinafter shall be referred according to their status before the Rent Controller, i.e. respondent herein as landlord and petitioner herein as tenant.

3. Landlord preferred a Rent Petition seeking eviction of tenant from non-residential premises, on the ground that she was owner in possession of two storied building, first floor whereof was being used by her for residential purposes, whereas two shops in ground floor were rented out to two different persons, one shop to present tenant Naresh Goyal and another to Vineet Goyal. Landlord had preferred two different Eviction Petitions a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top