Roop Lal vs State of Himachal Pradesh

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2024 Supreme(HP) 124

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SUSHIL KUKREJA
Roop Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. C.N.Singh, Advocate, Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate, Ms. Ranjana, Devi, Advocate, Mr. Amrick Singh, Advocate, and Mr. Kush Sharma, Advocate,
For the Respondents:I.N. Mehta and Mr. Yashwardhan Chauhan, Senior Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.S. Guleria, Deputy Advocate General, Mr. Balram Sharma, DSGI, Mr. Amrick Singh and Mr. Anuj Bali, Advocates,

Table of Content
1. petitioners claim equal pay and benefits. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. court highlights insensitivity of state. (Para 5 , 6)
3. court questions ngo status for funding. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. previous judgments support equal pay. (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
5. principle of equal work must apply. (Para 14)
6. legitimate aspirations of employment. (Para 16 , 17)
7. trust in employment should be upheld. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
8. responsibility of the state as employer. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
9. public policy considerations on employment. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
10. government must ensure justice for employees. (Para 28 , 29 , 30)
11. rights of disabled persons emphasized. (Para 31 , 32)
12. educational rights of visually impaired. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
13. past compliance with employees' claims. (Para 37 , 38 , 39)
14. discrimination in treatment of employees. (Para 40 , 41 , 42)
15. state cannot benefit from own wrong. (Para 43 , 44 , 45)
16. need for compliance with court orders. (Para 46 , 47)
17. court issues directions for compliance. (Para 48 , 49 , 50)
18. conclusion and order issued. (Para 51)

JUDGMENT :

Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J.

Since, common questions of law and facts arise for consideration in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2024 Supreme(HP) 124

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SUSHIL KUKREJARoop Lal – AppellantVersusState of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent

Cases Referred (13)

TARLOK SINGH CHAUHAN, SUSHIL KUKREJA
Roop Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent