MOHAN LAL
Makhan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
MOHAN LAL, J.
1. Petitioner has invoked the Inherent Jurisdiction of this court under the provisions of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereafter referred as the 'Code') for quashment of the order dated 15.02.2022 rendered by the trial court of Ld. Pr. Sessions Judge Samba in criminal challan titled UT of J&K Vs. Sandeep Sharma and Anr. for commission of offences punishable u/ss 8/21/22/25/29 of NDPS Act, whereby, the application of the petitioner seeking release of cash security of Rs. 100000/- (Rs. One Lac) deposited for grant of interim bail was dismissed.
2. Aggrieved of and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 15-02-2022, petitioner has assailed it's legality, propriety and correctness and has sought its setting aside/quashment on the following grounds:
(ii) that the son of petitioner applied for interim bai
Ram Lal v. State of U.P. 1980 Cri. L.J. 826 : AIR 1979 SC 1498
The court reaffirmed that the forfeiture of a bond under Section 446 of the CrPC requires adherence to procedural safeguards, including notice and an opportunity for the accused to respond, to uphold....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to the prescribed procedure under Section 446 CrPC for the forfeiture of surety bonds, including issuing show cause notic....
A surety must be afforded an opportunity to contest the imposition of a penalty for non-production of an accused, adhering to principles of natural justice.
Under Section 446(3) Cr.P.C., courts may discretionarily remit portion of penalty on forfeited surety bonds, factoring surety's sincere efforts, financial hardship and family impact, even in appeal t....
Court holds that the penalty for surety bond forfeiture must consider the surety's efforts and circumstances; excessive penalties can be modified at judicial discretion.
The court has discretion to remit penalties imposed on sureties under Section 446(3), considering the circumstances of the case and ensuring a fair outcome for the surety's financial status.
The court has discretion under Section 446 Cr.P.C to remit a portion of the penalty imposed on a surety, considering the financial situation of the surety and efforts to secure the accused's attendan....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.