Back
RAKESH KAINTHLA
Sheela Devi – Appellant
Versus
Santosh Kumari – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the plaintiff's ownership and the defendant's tenancy. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. defendant's appeal raised issues regarding previous litigation and tenancy claims. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. validity of tenancy notice confirmed. (Para 12 , 14) |
| 4. legal standards regarding the need for evidentiary support for claims. (Para 15 , 20 , 27) |
| 5. court's reasoning about the lack of evidence presented regarding previous suits. (Para 18 , 21 , 24) |
| 6. legal proceedings barred due to earlier judgments. (Para 22) |
| 7. claim for mesne profits upheld based on evidence. (Para 26 , 28) |
| 8. conclusion on the dismissal of the appeal due to lack of substantial questions of law. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
Rakesh Kainthla, J.
The present appeal is directed against the judgment & decree dated 23.8.2022, passed by the learned District Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., vide which the appeal filed by the appellant (defendant before the learned Trial Court) was dismissed. (Parties shall hereinafter be referred to in the same manner as they were arrayed before the learned Trial Court for convenience).
2. Briefly stated, the facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the plaintiffs filed a ci
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
