IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Savita - Petitioner
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. – Respondents
CWP No: 8483 of 2023
Decided On : 04-11-2023
JUDGMENT :
Ranjan Sharma, J.
Notice. Mr. B.C. Vema, Learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents.
2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ petition, is taken up for disposal, at this stage, in view of the order(s) intended to be passed herein.
3. FACTUAL MATRIX:
3(i). The petitioner, a Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) in the Elementary Education Department, has filed the instant writ petition, seeking the following prayer(s):-
ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for her transfer from present place of posting tosoft area of nearer to her house keeping in view of her adverse family circumstances and in view of the provisions of transfer policy in the interest of justice.”
3(ii). Case of the petitioner, as submitted by Mr Vinod Chauhan, the learned counsel, is that the petitioner joined service, on first appointment, as Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) in 2014, in Government Senior Secondary School Timbi, Education Block Shillai, i.e. a hard / difficult/rural/remote area, as per Office Memorandum dated 10th July 2013, “Comprehensive Guiding Principles-2013 for regulating the transfer of State Government Employees” {referred to as the Transfer Policy}. While working in the school at Timbi, her services were regularized in June 2018 and thereafter she was transferred on 22nd March, 2018 to GSSS Kaffota, District Sirmour, which against a categorized hard/difficult/rural/remote area, in terms of the transfer policy.
3(iii). Mr. Vinod Chauhan, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that she had filed a Civil Writ Petition No.6338 of 2023, Annexure P-1, seeking a direction to the respondents to consider her case for posting from “Tribal-Hard Areas” [referred to as Most Difficult / Tribal / Difficult /Hard/Rural (Remote) Areas to a “Soft Areas” [referred to as Non Tribal-Non Difficult/Hard/Rural/Remote Areas], in terms of the existing Transfer Policy.
4. It is further submitted that in compliance to the directions passed by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, she submitted a representation, Annexure P-2, indicating the stations of choice in the soft area, but her representation was turned down/rejected by the Respondent No.2-Directorof Elementary Education, Himachal Pradesh on 10.10.2023, Annexure P-3, forthe reason, that no vacancy is available, at the given stations of choice in the soft area and all the indicated stations are already filled up. In this background, the learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that her case has been rejected illegally and arbitrarily, on extraneous considerations and by acting dehors the transfer policy and therefore, her deserves to be considered in terms of the Transfer Policy.
5. STAND OF STATE AUTHORITIES:
Per contra, Mr. Anup Rattan, learned Advocate General assisted by Mr. B.C. Verma, learned Additional Advocate General submits that, unless and until the vacant stations are available, the petitioner cannot claim posting to soft areas/stations, as of right. However, the Learned Advocate General fairly submits that instead of filing reply, in this case, in case the petitioner makes a fresh representation her case shall be examined/considered, in terms of the existing transfer policy.
6. LEGAL POSITION IN TRANSFER MATTERS:
6(i). Borne out from the mandate of Law, as evolved from time to time, the legal principles in normal parlance and the exceptions, permitting judicial intervention are to be kept in view.
6(ii). In normal parlance, an employee of the state government, who hold a State Cadre post, as in this case, is liable to be transferred from one place to another throughout the State. Such government servant, who holds a transferable post, has neither any fundamental right nor any vested right to remain posted at one place or to
Abani Kanta Ray vs. State of Orissa and others
Amir Chand vs. State of Himachal Pradesh
B. Varadha Rao vs. State of Karnataka
E.P. Royappa vs. State of Tamil Nadu
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan vs. Damodar Prasad Pandey and others
Ms. X versus Registrar General, High Court of Madhya Pradesh
National Hydroelectric Power Corporation Ltd. vs. Shri Bhagwan and Shiv Prakash
Public Services Tribunal Bar Association vs. State of U.P. and another
Rajendra Singh and others vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and others
Rajneesh Khajuria vs Wockhadrt Limited and Anr.
Sant Ram Pant vs. State of H.P. and others
Shilpi Bose (Mrs.) and others vs. State of Bihar and others
Somesh Tiwari vs. Union of India and others
State of Haryana and others vs. Kashmir Singh and another
State of M.P. and another vs. S.S. Kourav and others
State of U.P. and others vs. Gobardhan Lal
Union of India and others vs. H.N. Kirtania
Union of India and others Vs. Janardhan Debanath and another
Judicial intervention in transfer matters is warranted when decisions violate established transfer policies and principles of fairness, ensuring no arbitrary actions by authorities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of fair and equal treatment in transfer and posting, as mandated by the Transfer Policy clauses 12, 15, and 16.1, to avoid prolonged....
Mandatory and uniform application of Transfer Policy, fair and objective exercise of discretion in employee transfers.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the importance of following the transfer policy and statutory provisions in making transfer decisions, and the binding nature of policies framed by....
Transfers within service are at discretion of authorities based on administrative needs, not strictly bound by service tenure guidelines.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.